To really secure bitcoins, a hardware wallet or a passphrase in a safe deposit box are both pretty simple options that nontechnical people use all the time. Neither is expensive and both are widely known.
To really secure bitcoins, a hardware wallet or a passphrase in a safe deposit box are both pretty simple options that nontechnical people use all the time. Neither is expensive and both are widely known.
I haven't used a hardware wallet - I suspect they solve the transferring problem. But what's the risk my hardware wallet still works a year from now? 10 years from now?
I decided trusting Coinbase in 2021 is the most reasonable option for the amount I have. (Different calculus back in 2016). I admit I don't know what I'd do with 8-figure balances though.
After that, plug the hardware wallet into a computer and you can transfer without the computer ever seeing your private key. The hardware wallet displays the destination address, which you should check.
I do agree that Coinbase is reasonably safe, as long as you use a strong password and 2FA, and don't give them your phone number.
_If_ you can get a safe deposit box in your bank, that is. My local bank (Chase) is always sold out of boxes. Sure, you'll next say: change your bank. But the other one (BoA) is also out.
My point is, it's not such an easy option as you're making it out to be.
I got one last week without any issue.
I managed to get a box in the basement of the BofA in Harvard Square back then, and kinda wish I'd kept it, since I doubt I could get one today.
I'd say that ~97%-99% of the people in the US and Europe have no idea how to use a hardware wallet. The vast majority have no idea what a hardware wallet is. You're very far off the mark in your estimate.
Bitcoin is at the adoption stage where the general public is only beginning to use services like Coinbase. They do not know how to use a hardware wallet, most of them do not know that such a thing exists.
> what hope is that for regular folks could make safe use of said value store
"Why Johnny Can't Encrypt" was published decades ago. With this stuff you cannot make any mistake. PGP advice appeared to be good and simple, yet people made errors all the time. I wouldn't expect this to be different.
1) Lose the passphrase. The device does quiz the user on words of the passphrase upon setup, to be sure the user at least wrote it down. Hopefully this reinforces its importance. Ledger provides a card to write the words, with prominent instructions to save it somewhere safe.
2) When sending, don't verify on the device's display that you're sending the money where you think. But the display is right there on the device, and displays the destination address while waiting for you to push a button right next to it.
For smart contracts it helps to get a larger device that shows all the contract parameters, but for simple sends that's all there is to it.
You are creating a persona tailored to back up your argument. It is not that strange that a good chunk of "common people" buying right now bitcoins know what an hardware wallet is, at least as a concept (not the tech implementation obviously).