The real litmus test for claims of effective spinal cord repair treatments is primate testing. If you see mice and not chimps, the treatment is probably a dead end.
Not to say this research doesn't have value - I fully support continued and rigorous research in this area - but hyperbolic claims like: "it works in mice, so it should also work in humans" aren't helping the cause.
This is not a cheap process in terms of money and manpower. I think they probably have reason for confidence.
IIRC, the motor CNS in mammals is pretty similar across the board.
Now we at least have hope this might work for humans.
Rodents represent readily available models that can be used for a deeper understanding of basic biological mechanisms and for proof of concept for preclinical research hypotheses. However, attempts at direct clinical translation to humans have proven problematic or even impossible to date, principally due to issues of scaling and complexity.
https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/ijscrt/international-jo...
Do you have a viable alternative for early stage research?