Australian Rhino Project
theaustralianrhinoproject.org
theaustralianrhinoproject.org
In 1973, the South Australian government started buying up huge swaths of land from farmers, with the goal of creating a satellite city for the state capital of Adelaide. They felt Adelaide was growing too fast, and to stop it from becoming a sprawling congested mess, they wanted a discrete satellite city for the burgeoning blue and white collar industries to expand into.
That never happened. The population growth stagnated in SA, and after a long tenure the politicians who had backed the scheme finished their time in office, and the planning department responsible was abolished. This left the government with over a thousand hectares of land in the middle of nowhere, with no plans on how to use it.
So in 1982, the Planning and Environment minister announced that 1,000 hectares of Crown land would become an open range zoo, and it has been developed into one of the world's leading conservation parks.
More recently, they've gotten more funding from the government and are developing the park into a more accessible location, which overall should help the park grow and help develop their conservation efforts.
I was put on to this story by this excellent youtube video, which contains some wicked footage of 70s and 80s Australia, and dives in depth into the urban planning aspects of this story and what the government had hoped to achieve with a satellite city, equally fascinating!
Let’s say they manage to create a population in Australia. With an ever so small surplus, we could take that and eat it. Prices for legal rhino burger would probably be insane, right? I mean - that and horns are why they are poached. And legal horns could be a thing then, too.
Seems like the best option for any animal’s long term survival is to become human food or amusement.
Guess it take too much time and resources for rhinos to be viable livestock regrettably.
To me the contention with any plan, conservation or otherwise, is "be ultra careful what you bring into Australia".
Certainly not an expert, I'm sure in any case they would be very careful doing any of this, tracking etc. And I don't feel rhino's are quite as aggressive as say, hippos (authorities did not think Escobar's hippos would survive in Colombia; that turned out to be dead wrong). But I would certainly be very curious to see how introducing such a large aggressive herbivore with no natural predators would affect the area, if only because it does seem like a doable task to control the population.
We have an invasive camel problem which probably serves as a good benchmark for what a pest rhino situation would look like here. There is a bounty program for hunters to get paid for eradicating them from Australia. It's a touchy subject, no doubt. But being hard hooved animals they destroy the top soil and kill the ecosystem our bugs and birds thrive on. Camels, sheep and cattle have done immeasurable damage to the Australian ecosystem.
But the first thought is always...just the track record. Rabbits, foxes, cats, cane toads, donkeys, camels, goats, pigs. But, like you say, they aren't going to be losing track of their rhinos.
But, arguing conservation as a practical application, has Australia ever intentionally introduced a species for a practical application and had it not go absolutely sideways (big caveat, usually once the animals escaped, or were just turned loose)?
I did find a small success story in reducing the numbers of invasive Myna birds by volunteer trapping, which is seeing native species return to the areas affected. So that's nice.
The more fanciful terms of venery (aka nouns of assembly) are very much deliberate contrivances.
> In the course of the 14th century, it became a courtly fashion to extend the vocabulary, and by the 15th century, the tendency had reached exaggerated and even satirical proportions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_noun#Terms_of_vener...
https://www.amazon.ca/Cache-Jewels-Other-Collective-Nouns/dp...
EDIT - I just noticed a review for the book that is 1 Star "It should be more obvious this is a kids book". This listing comes with recommendations for "That's Not My Puppy" and "Bear Sleeps for Christmas". I wish people wouldn't leave bad reviews because THEY didn't interpret the product correctly.