Hacker News Reader

Comment by autoencoders | Hacker News Reader

I agree. The terms will be changed. I used an auto-generated Terms generator for now (termly.io)

I would like to rewrite it.

What I do is just keep your files on the server for a week. In case you have an issue, I will look into your file to fix your issue. And if you want, you can give consent for me to further improve the service. (Say you have an accent which the AI is bad and I can use your audio file to understand why it failed.)

View on HN

With this statement you’ve now shown that your site doesn’t take contracts seriously and opened the door to people arguing future contacts are also invalid. I’d delete this response asap.

Why? They can change the policy and ask for a confirmation, as every service out there is already doing.

What? This person made something, we pointed out an improvement and they said they'd change it. You're literally complaining that it wasn't perfect already, and thus they somehow don't "respect stuff".

Sorry, who said “respect stuff?” I don’t see what you’re quoting. And who is “complaining?” I will just restate the warning, admitting that you’ve auto generated terms, didn’t know what was in them and forced everyone to sign them invalidates all terms of the current contract and gives ground for future disputes on completely new contracts. So… I’ll reiterate my recommendation to delete the post. This seems to have stuck a nerve with you so I’m not looking to get into it beyond that.

How and when have you seen it happen that a contract was invalidated by one party indicating that they would prefer a more appropriate contract?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com