UK to ban all in-hand mobile phone use while driving in 2022
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Would be nice if people were always actually disqualified at 12 points.
>While numbers of exceptional hardship pleas are not recorded separately, official figures show that more than 83,000 people escaped an automatic driving ban due to “mitigating circumstances” between 2011 and 2020.
>Christopher Gard accumulated eight convictions for using a mobile phone while driving but escaped a ban in June 2015 by arguing that it would cause him to lose his job, highlighting that this would impact negatively on his young son, and his son’s mother. He promised to keep his phone locked in his boot. Six weeks later, he had already broken his promise, and was once again texting behind the wheel when he ploughed into the back of cyclist Lee Martin, killing him. Gard tried to cover up his actions by deleting his texts. He was later jailed for nine years for causing death by dangerous driving.
I lost a childhood friend to a woman with a long drunk driving record, who naturally disregarded her suspended license and plowed right through us playing street hokey in broad daylight.
Since then I've thought penalties should be more punitive when licenses get suspended, like by impounding the car to ensure that the person can't just drive it anyway. But like the loopholes you mention, I haven't found a way to do it that doesn't incur further hardship, like losing employment or usurious impound lot fees accruing in the interim.
Until we're happy going to a Fifth Element style, license-as-the-key ignition, I don't think we'll achieve what you want. That said, given the drink-driving controls that are being mandated, ID checks seem pretty simple.
Incredible that the lawmakers were stupid enough last time to ban not phone usage in general, but just texting and making a call. And now they are repeating the same mistake by specifying that it's illegal to scroll through playlists or play games? Just ban phone usage nonstop already like other, sane countries. Make an exception for navigational purposes, and hopefully we can have fewer deaths because of distracted driving.
Or even better, create a law that outlaws being distracted by anything while driving, requiring drivers to stop if they are distracted.
(And perhaps even poking 'next track' button which is not that different to the same on the dashboard's cassette player.)
The prose you quoted is just the paper's explanation, I assume the 'all in-hand use' from the title is closer to what will be in the actual bill.
I sure hope so, but considering the track record, I'm avoiding to assume anything.
I don't think it's quite fair to be totally harsh on the legislators not predicting modern smartphone complexity.
If you ban it completely you'd also ban using GPS/Maps/Sat Nav apps.
I don't know exactly when the previous law came into effect, but I remember the Nokia 3310 (released 2000) had games on it already.
> If you ban it completely you'd also ban using GPS/Maps/Sat Nav apps.
Yeah, hence I wrote about excepting navigational purposes in my comment.
If you need to read a map, pull over, stop the vehicle, and read the map.
Considering lots of people place their phone/nav device on the windshield and block enough sight to hide a schoolbus in their direct view I don't think this actually matters all that much.
iOS also switches into driving focus mode which turns all the other distractions off: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208090
The legislation is perfectly good.
Using Siri is more dangerous than texting. The below linked research (and others) found that using Siri raises the reaction time 36%. That is 1% worse than texting! For comparison, driving at the drink-drive limit (UK) is 12%. So you are doing yourself a big disservice by using Siri and thinking you are safe(r).
https://www.iamroadsmart.com/campaign-pages/end-customer-cam...
Pretty simple.
Can you give a specific example? There are only a few countries with safer roads (e.g. Norway, Sweden, Switzerland depending how you measure) and I know that Norway has less restrictive laws and Sweden has almost none except for egregious behaviour like texting (last time I checked.)
The law has basically been extended to cover possibly non-dangerous holding of mobile phones to lighten the burden of proof.
If so installed, you may use it to initiate and accept calls.
You may also use your phone for navigation, entertainment &c provided the phone is configured for whatever purpose while the vehicle is stationary or using either voice commands or vehicle-integrated controls.
You may NOT touch any phone buttons or touch screens for any other purpose than dialing a number or answering a call while the vehicle is moving.
I can basically do whatever I want with it as long as it stays in the holder. If I remove it and put it away without taking my eyes of the road, the penalty is as described above. If I were to type this comment on it while mounted and still payed attention to trafic, no penalty.
And yet I still see a massive number of people with their phone to their ear.
This was not stupidity. It's an example of specific, well-scoped lawmaking, which is exactly the sort of thing we should welcome. It's targeted specifically at the use of communication devices while driving, provides appropriate exemptions, and seems like an entirely appropriate step given the nature of the mobile device market in 2003. Now the regulations are being tightened further, again in a reasonable way, to deal with the problems that now exist.
And now they are repeating the same mistake by specifying that it's illegal to scroll through playlists or play games
This is not what is happening, and is clearly an example of the sort of thing that will be banned under a more general rule of "don't use a mobile device while driving".
Just ban phone usage nonstop already like other, sane countries. Make an exception for navigational purposes, and hopefully we can have fewer deaths because of distracted driving.
This is exactly what is happening, along with additional clarifications on what counts as driving (e.g. being stopped at traffic lights is still driving) and ensuring that commonly-used, safe features (for example, making a contactless payment at a toll booth) are not caught by the regulations.
Remember if a driver chooses to challenge a ticket, the state needs to prove proof. Texting and calls are easy to prove. Having a phone in your hand is easy to prove.
Just because a solution isn't perfect doesn't mean it wouldn't help.
> https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/legal/mobile-phone-laws/
> It’s illegal to hold a phone or sat nav while driving or riding a motorcycle.
> the police can charge you for driving without due care and attention or careless driving.
Everyone already thought it was illegal, inluding the governments own website and the highway code.
This seems to be a tough new law (we are tough on crime, your taxes hard at work) designed to make the current law the law.
Note: The article and other similar articles are all reguritations of the press release on the matter. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/any-use-of-hand-held-mobi...
>Or even better, create a law that outlaws being distracted by anything while driving, requiring drivers to stop if they are distracted.
Exactly! Why are companies allowed to put up those digital billboards, which are appearing everywhere in cities at the moment? When they are literally designed to distract drivers.One particularly notable one near where I live spans busy 4-lane junction. Because what drivers negotiating that junction really need to aid their concentration is to have ginormous screen displaying a sexy model in his or her underwear emblazoned right across the highway.
Another one near me is close to a rugby club and plays video clips of the team in action. Again, no other purpose than to grab the attention of passing motorists. Why are these not banned also?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/oct/31/lorry-driver...
Every day I see people still doing it though here in London. There is no excuse. Not one.
Actually two weeks ago there was a huge Jewsons truck blocking an entire junction while driver was on his phone. The driver in front of me who was blocked confronted him and he told her to fuck off and what was she going to do about it. She used her phone to take a photo of him on his. I hope something is done. Some people are so arrogant and thoughtless.
https://www.ashmanssolicitors.com/blog/have-you-been-caught-...
Re the case of the lorry driver: There was video footage of him browsing his phone, he killed 4 people. This isn't normally the case which is why many people think it's OK to drive whilst distracted by their phones ('multi-tasking' is the phrase I think they often use?).
If laws around usage of mobile phones whilst driving were tightened up and rigorously enforced from the outset then it is less likely such a tragedy would have happened.
This was my point. As well as a gentle reminder for anyone who thinks there are never going to be serious consequences of doing similar.
I wholeheartedly agree that phones shouldn't be used during driving, but to drive safer and more efficiently, the country needs a change in driving culture.
There is always room for improvement, but to suggest the UK has a poor driving safety culture is demonstrably false.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-r...
2.9 fatalities per 100,000 inhabitants per year... That means that if everyone lived in a medium sized town of 100,000 people, each town would have nearly 3 of its inhabitants killed on the roads per year. Over a period of , say, 10 years, you 're fairly likely to know or be related to one of them. It's still pretty terrible, even if other places on this planet have even much worse.
What I find especially odd recently are the cases of people being reckless with their own cars suffering as a result - I get that whilst driving a company vehicle, certain types of people will turn a blind eye with it, but the number of cases of people scraping their own car's bumpers as they fly over speed bumps is definitely on the rise. I'm not suggesting they willfully set out to scrape them, but it's obvious to a bystander this will happen given the way they drive and don't break in time. It's as if they haven't the forethought to connect their behaviour and the outcome.
How's the number of traffic-related injuries?
Seems incredible this has not been made illegal too.
I’m sure they’re not as much distracting, but they still require more attention than they should.
The point is to sop people holding phones in their hands or on their laps and spending too more time looking at them than a spit of a second, checking social media etc.
With the rise of carplay and android auto, they present simplified, low-distraction interfaces.
As for changing radio station or tracks. Both my cars I've owned for the last 10 years has steering wheel controls which can do this. I never really need to touch my actual radio.
The only time I would ever want to touch my car's or phone's screen is before I start a trip to turn on navigation software or start up Spotify.
In the olden days, you could simply turn a knob to change the climate control or in an earlier time, there were radio buttons to change to another radio station (hence the name). Now, it seems there's various things I can't do in a modern car without stopping first.
Well...
https://www.iamroadsmart.com/campaign-pages/end-customer-cam...
Hopefully the new law will tighten things up and clarify.
We need something general about distractions and may be a mandate that requires cars to disable touch screen whilst moving. “Put gear shift lever in park to enable touch screen”
And despite all that, road deaths are pretty low.
Is this genuinely the next most important thing we could do to get people where they’re going quickly and safely?
For my money, I’d focus on reintroducing traffic police in the UK. Ostensibly they’ve never gone away, they still exist. However it’s a skeleton staff only really equipped to deal with road traffic accidents. There aren’t enough to keep things flowing safely and smoothly - which means actively stopping drivers regularly for a word in the ear. Not a ticket, just a word in the first instance.
But I think the actual handling of the device should be avoided, a fixed mount helps a lot. Looking down is really disorienting.
But I'm glad I don't have to drive anymore. I find it too stressful these days. Traffic has become too busy and there's more rules to worry about with variable speed limits depending on the hour etc.
I'm not sure that holds true.
"Participants underestimated by as much as 5 seconds the time they thought they spent looking away from the road when engaging with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay via touch control.
https://www.iamroadsmart.com/campaign-pages/end-customer-cam...
However injuries are incredibly high, >100,000 in the UK.
I think if we consider QALYs instead of deaths then the calculus on importance becomes more obvious.