What happened when one hacker met the RIAA on Facebook | Hacker News Reader

What happened when one hacker met the RIAA on Facebook

paulsawaya.com

27 pointshumanlever12 comments

Near the end, he mentions he will use the list of songs the RIAA sent him as a sort of "blacklist" for his application.

This makes me wonder: Why doesn't the RIAA have a publicly available list of ALL works that it represents? Then anyone who wanted to could easily check if their app/service was infringing.

It seems so obvious. Of course, I understand things aren't so simple as just an artist-and-title list. But if you don't want people to facilitate copying of your covered works, you really should make it easy for them to check (like a publiclly accessible database) for covered works.

That list itself is quite possibly considered 'valuable' intellectual property...

Maybe they'd release such a list if you pay them a fee and sign an NDA and etc etc....

Not releasing the list also allows the RIAA to take advantage of 'progressive' applications like this and pick and choose who they sue and who they don't.

They can sit back and watch as these apps helps promote their top performers, and once they've gotten their use from it, sue the pants off of them.

It's much better to keep your enemies in a space of FUD then to clearly explain the 'law' and how to abide by it.

http://www.riaaradar.com/ - RIAA Radar isn't exactly what you're looking for, but worth mentioning.

It looks like they're scraping record company info from Amazon and cross-referencing that against a list of which ones are affiliated with the RIAA. (#3 on their RIAA Radar Indie Top 100 is "The Happiest Baby on the Block - The New Way to Calm Crying and Help Your Baby Sleep Longer (DVD)", though, which implies they're probably not filtering the data set thoroughly. There are a few other DVDs further down the list.)

Part of the problem is to be authoritative, such a list would be gigantic, and growing at a rapid rate.

this is a shame. since i was a kid, probably 11/12 years old, ive thought the riaa's ways are wrong. they use the law not as a point of mindful compromise, but as a strongarm tactic. Shame is, that artists don't see their fair share. Everyone always asks me what I would do if Publictivity or another venture gave me what the Valley calls "Fk You Money"... I'd go right after the RIAA and turn the music industry upside down on its head. Artists would get compensated, users would be happy, and labels would get their fair share too (if theyre still needed). Much much easier said than done, but it's going to happen at some point.

Remember to get good body guards :)

I've always wondered how the RIAA looks to see if it's copyrighted or not. If they just use the app's metadata, which in turn uses the MP3's metadata, why not encrypt the MP3's metadata? Even ROT-13 would work since "Britney Spears - Hit Me Baby One More Time" becomes "Oevgarl Fcrnef - Uvg Zr Onol Bar Zber Gvzr", something not on their massive Excel sheet.

This is exactly what happened with Napster. After Napster stopped accepting certain filenames which were marked as "infringing", users just made a plugin to rename all files with rot13 type things, and to rot13 any search queries in the application.

Because:

* Most people like to download files with proper names and metadata.

* The app itself could not provide such a plugin, as it could be argued that this was designed to facilitate copyright infringement.

* Most users wouldn't know how to install some third party plugin to the app to perform this, especially as the app provider couldn't link to it, for the reasons above.

PS. If anyone here is from reddit, and believes taking people's creative efforts without paying for it where asked is not wrong, please justify why.

Thanks.

PS. If anyone here is from reddit, and believes taking people's creative efforts without paying for it where asked is not wrong, please justify why.

It's wrong, but people think it's right to do it and you can't prevent them from doing it. So you can either whine all day about how these people are stealing, or find some solution that actually works.

True, you can't prevent anyone from doing it, but you don't have to - all you have to do is make it difficult enough.

RIAA meets hacker. Hacker loses.

Rinse, repeat.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com