Intel copying ARM’s big little is just stupid and should not have been done
semiaccurate.com
semiaccurate.com
I'm not convinced.
The pictures I’ve seen of the CPUs that implement this kind of technology show that even if you split them into equal numbers of CPU types, the little ones take up way less space, approximately 4x less. So, in the space of 5 “BIG” cores, you could instead get 4 “BIG” cores and 4 “little” cores.
This seems like a huge win to me, since each of those little CPUs could do a lot of background tasks that always need to be done, but don’t need to take up a full “BIG” core to execute.
You get a lot more parallelism this way, for relatively little cost.
That seems to me to be a “BIG” win.
P and E cores make sense (in laptop and desktop) because power consumption can be reduced for tasks that are simply "beneath" real performance core, it's not stupid.
Now Intel was optimistic with regard to support, time will tell if this does not just introduce weird edge cases but right now various software are breaking because of a lack of awareness. This will get better eventually.
Of course being Intel there's likely to be extra layers of insanity to prevent any interesting potential in the idea from ever being realized meaningfully.