Ask HN: Could FAANG companies just solve climate change? | Hacker News Reader

Ask HN: Could FAANG companies just solve climate change?

9 pointspkdpic19 comments

Serious question, just wondering if these companies can afford to get into a space race then maybe they could just pivot to a carbon capture campaign or something?

View on HN

Proposed solutions:

Facebook: Move to the Metaverse

SpaceX: Move to Mars

Google: Just click on the damn commercials

Amazon: Move close to the Warehouse and pick it yourself

Netflix: Accepting submissions for a real Squid game

Apple: This planet is not prettier than our products

Love it. What about Tesla and Twitter though?

Twitter: better policy through shaming people. Have you shamed someone today?

Tesla: Too obvious. Buy a Tesla. BTW, move to Mars.

From what I'd gather, I'd say:

Tesla: build products that can be fueled by renewable energy.

No, because since the FAANGs aren't Chinese companies, they have no real power or influence in China, and China is polluting so much that even if every other country in the world stopped polluting completely, it wouldn't be enough to solve climate change.

Google has committed to net zero emissions by 2030 I believe. Some one from Google can elaborate here.

I haven’t seen much from the others.

Google claims to be net-zero since 2007. Their 2030 goal is they will not even buy power from local grids that have fossil fuel inputs.

Cost of CO2 capture: $100/ton or somewhere in that range - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29217810 for discussion.

Global CO2 emission: about 35B ton per year globally.

Which gives us 3.5 trillion dollars per year, which is, surprisingly, less than the combined market cap of FAANG.

Hmm... so if all the shareholders of FAANG sells all their stocks and donate it to an international organization that use all the money for carbon capture, we may delay global warming by about a year. Not terribly bad, but not practical and I don't think it's sustainable. (Which company are you gonna sell the next year?)

Enough of these companies create their own custom silicon.

Here is how I think they could help with just that:

If they could reduce their energy costs at the data center with this, that would help.

If they could sell custom hardware for crypto mining to reduce energy use, that would help.

Many of these companies helps quite a lot with spreading awareness and tracking Covid-19 during the peak pandemic. If they could apply their influence and reach for this cause, just imagine.

Think straws, many people do not know they these jam recycling machines.

Imagine connecting and promoting material science research and products related to bio-degradable corn based plastics? There is an island of plastic in the Pacific ocean larger than France.

No, they cannot compensate for both China and India which as the two biggest still developing economies produce the most CO2. Don't forget that Africa is projected to enter into rapid development in the next 30-50 years. The west, no matter the good intentions, cannot balance out the produce of half of humanity if that half does not want or is unable to join in.

These companies make popular webapps (or computer hardware in the case of Apple). Why not companies in a more suitable field?

In a way, some of them already are contributing to solving climate change because they provide the infrastructure required for moving work environments from the office into the cloud.

Unnecessarily moving people around for the sole purpose of working at a specific location is a huge contributory factor to climate change.

Climate change is a really big problem. Much bigger than covid. Maybe the first instinct with really big problems is that not enough money has been thrown at it. It looks like there are lots of practical problems as well.

They might not be able to solve climate change, but they can for sure slow it down by kickstarting geo-engineering efforts. They may even be in a better position to do this than nation-states.

Maybe rehearsing leet code and funding studies that result in a "no shit we caused even bigger problems" outcome can make certain people think they can solve it.

I'd like to know what "climate chagne is Solved" looks like.

At what point will we be able to say "its fixed, its not a problem anymore"?

Re-glaciation of water sources for major human settlements would be one good indicator.

Average global temperature stops rising?

Start by questioning the premise that climate change can be “solved”. Most of the “climate change” conversations today are politics not science. Dissenting voices tend to be suppressed in the media.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com