Netflix released a horror movie written by a bot and it's spectacular | Hacker News Reader

Netflix released a horror movie written by a bot and it's spectacular

cnet.com

94 pointsnradov40 comments

Netflix has a whole series of short videos like this that are “written by bots”. They definitely aren’t though, they are written by humans to sound like a bot wrote them. Many of the jokes use a level of irony and word play far beyond the state of the art in AI today. Still funny though.

Yeah, in theory it's possible there was some AI text generation used at some point, but it's clearly writers aping a style, a lot of the funny 'errors' are not something a text-prediction AI is likely to make (especially with how punny most of them are). The rest of the series is pretty funny, though I think the horror movie is the best one.

Sigh, yeah, the CNet journalist^W writer is either incompetent or lying... if he thinks "It's just a silly article", does he and his editor think CNet is The Onion, without letting us know? Or can I consider CNet a publisher of fake news?

Maybe it’s an ad. Paid for

Could be the bot wrote it, but like many movies etc, someone wrote the screenplay, based upon the story.

Lots of change from story to screenplay...

My "That 70's Show", sci-fi reunion story would suffer too greatly in this process, so I am scared to send it to Netflix.

I think you can safely consider cnet an unreliable news source.

It's Keaton Patti, a comedian whose shtick is writing nonsense and pretending that it was written by an AI.

So it's all just a marketing trick? There is no AI behind this, just a comedian?

It’s Twitter.

most of the comments in this comments section are written by Keaton Patti to stimulate discussion. Including this one

Like most AI companies, it is just people.

Don't mind the man behind the curtain.

Yep, I mean amazon literally calls its service "mechanical turk" x)

From the last time I looked into it (I may be recalling this incorrectly): the script is AI generated text that the writer sifted through, edited, and stitched together to form an amusing, vaguely coherent narrative.

So it's perhaps closer to "inspired by AI" than "written by AI".

I googled the name and couldn’t find anything on that. How do you know?

Janelle Shane, who does this sort of thing for real on the excellent blog https://aiweirdness.com gave a good breakdown on Twitter: https://twitter.com/janellecshane/status/1007061610005794817

It's mentioned in the article.

"Netflix worked with Keaton Patti, who's done this bot thing before. This time round the bot watched over 400,000 hours of horror movies before penning its great masterpiece, 'Mr. Puzzles Wants You to Be Less Alive'."

Right, but that’s not the assertion. The assertion is that it’s not really a bot, which I couldn’t find anything about.

I spent quite a bit of time using gpt-2 to try and make some new Dungeons & Dragons spells. I noticed that around 1 in a thousand spells it would generate would kind of make sense if you interpret it as being trying to be funny. It seems like AI is better at making funny things (unintentional so).

Here are two examples of some spells it generated.

Arcanum creates a massive pool of magical energy similar to that created by the Chariot of Crustaceans. The energy travels down the caster's legs and retains a magical aura similar to that of the ancient people of Cyprus. The spell creates one of the following: a dense fog, raging waters, strong winds, continuous thunderstorms, or a strong gust of wind. The material components are sand and powdered animal hoof.

Holding out his palm, the caster evokes a magical array of sounds in the area where he stands. The following sequence of events occurs, based on the alphabetical order of the alphabet. 01 Stand Long Time 02 Last Words 03 Reach Down From The Ground 04 Make A Friend At A Distance 05 Five Minutes Friends 06 Friends For 10 minutes 07 A Word For Theeunday 08 Move Large Object 09 No Talking 10 Naga Tribe 11 Soundtrack To A Favourable Weather 12 How To Be Seen By A Smart Elemental 13 Back To The Main Team

I decided to collect the best ones and put it in this free pdf if anyone wants to read some more.

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/324417/Clockwork-Demon-...

> It seems like AI is better at making funny things (unintentional so).

Partly this is because we take AI-generated sentences slight differently to ones by humans maybe. It feels less funny once we found out someone behind intentionlly making up the joke, while AI never be "intentional".

They remind me of Half Life: Full Life Consequences[1], which wasn't written by a bot but pretty much has all the qualities of a 'written by bot style video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHxyZaZlaOs

IIRC, it is the guys who made it took a a poorly written Half Life fan fiction (possibly written by a 9 year old), brought to life by a gary's mod machinima

Well, they never said the bots they are using also use the latest AI technology. It just says "bots".

These could be purposely flawed bots, with AI only good enough to create rubbish, hilarious, fantastic rubbish.

Humans trying to sound like AI, which this clearly is, never seem to sound like AI. At least not in this genre. At short time scales the writing is too wrong, and at long scales it makes too much sense.

>Mr Puzzles, clearly based on a misunderstanding of the movie Saw. He's a bad guy attempting to kill people via elaborate set-ups that make no sense. There are a lot of Saw movies so it's possible the bot spent 400,000 hours watching nothing but Saw movies.

How would that be possible? There seem to be nine Saw movies. Nowhere near 400,000 hours.

The title reads as follows:

>Netflix released a horror movie written by a bot and it's spectacular

That is confusing and click-baity.

The subtitle reads as follow:

>It's good. And by good I mean terrible.

Is it good or terrible? Does the word "terrible" refer to horror movies and sinister plots?

>As a journalist constantly stressed about being replaced by robots.

Did Mr. Puzzles put a period where the rest of the sentence should be to torment us?

> How would that be possible? There seem to be nine Saw movies. Nowhere near 400,000 hours.

Pretty simple; each Saw movie is 45,000 hours long.

More realistically, a training process might involve watching each movie more than once.

More realistically, it was hyperbole poking fun at how many Saw movies there are.

> >It's good. And by good I mean terrible.

> Is it good or terrible? Does the word "terrible" refer to horror movies and sinister plots?

There is a whole thing about people watching terrible horror movies and enjoying them because they are terrible. So I guess that references that.

Netflix’s whole catalog feels like it was written by a bot. All the scifi is grimdark dystopia.

Came here to post exactly that. Almost all their own stuff is extremely formulaic. Even when it's well made, it's exceedingly bland.

I'm stuck in the trap of there being one or two programs my kids want to watch and having to keep the subscription

I could not agree more. I don't get why they keep pumping out the same strange SciFi movies they do.

And violence.

Every show they make seems like the result of an algorithm telling them people want more violence.

Well it probably is...

I always find it annoying when people or media breathlessly circulate something that is “written by bots” and then it patently is not in any meaningful sense. this is clearly the work of someone imitating what they think a bot might produce.

It's funny though, not scary. Was it trying to be funny? It's funny because it's absurd, and it's absurd I assume because the bot has no context as to what any of this means.

Actually, AI has been pretty good at the horror genre for a while now: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/88/4e/92/884e928de4c04503a9b6...

State of the art.

About the same level of sophistication as I see when I use modern seearch engines: vaguely related, happens to find some impressive result once in a while that I couldn't have found with a pure keyword match but most of the time a playful dog that brings back something, anything and not necessarily the thing you asked for.

Tangential : any idea what modeling software can be used to produce this kind of movie ? Is it stock 3DS or whatever is state of the art, or are there easier to use thing to produce poorly looking movies like this ?

I wish there was a service in which a bot could write the dialog between my wife and I. Or, an out of work comedy writer could write our entire set of interactions for the day. Just to see how it goes.

Looks like something on Robot Chicken, or more specifically, something from Rick and Morty's interdimensional cable.

Sam Raimi should definitely write a film about a poultergeisha lol

Reply on news.ycombinator.com