If I understood it correctly, the most compelling evidence was the real data transfer rate of those emails, deduced from the file timestamps, which ruled out their provenance from the server.
> Something that's not only trivial to fake (...)
Well, in this case that would go against the original accusation, therefore it would either be pointless or the explanation would require a conspiracy with double agents planting fake compromising evidence.
Political tendencies will allow people to make attributions they agree with and then simultaneously question attributions they disagree with politically.
USB sticks seem to be weird about transfer speeds and they look like they are size dependent. Bunch of small files take longer than one monolithic large file given a total size.
What was the connection speed? I've never seen it stated anywhere, and in case the server was hosted in a data center the argument would collapse fairly quickly.