Hacker News Reader

> There's a "typo" for one thing: that top line should be "%c>%c¥n" rather than "%c%¥n", judging by what's below.

Um... what? The top line already says "%c>%c¥n", doesn't it?

Ironically there's a typo in his calling out of the typo. He meant to write: should be "%c>%c¥n" rather than "%c>%¥n".

The second c is missing in the screenshot.