> the comment that said GitHub + static hosting (this)
That's not the what the comment you're responding to said.
> I'm saying that you don't need external static hosting if you're already using GitHub
That's a huge "iff" of an if.
That's not the what the comment you're responding to said.
> I'm saying that you don't need external static hosting if you're already using GitHub
That's a huge "iff" of an if.
> This, along with GitHub/GitLab make for great, free ways for people to learn some basic HTML.
I read that as saying "a combination of both GitHub/GitLab and the static hosting service OP linked". Are you saying this person is saying "one or the other" instead of "a combination of"?
As long as they mean "a combination of", I maintain that there's no reason to use both, if you're already using GitHub (that's the implicit a priori assumption) as GitHub provides static hosting already. Hope that clears it up
Yes, clearly. As you say, there's no reason to use both. There's no reason, then, to think that that's what the person meant.
If there are two possible interpretations of a statement, one which makes sense and one which doesn't, chances are that the one makes sense is the one that was intended, and not the one that doesn't.