That is really cool project, but I can't give this to non technical people
Let there always be tools tailored to specific group's needs, the one-size-fits-all approach nearly always ends up dumbing down the interface by removing 'difficult to use' functions and 'complicated' options to present a Fisher-prize interface with big happy buttons and lots of open space.
Also notice that the Books tools weigh in at 47K compressed, there is something to be said for light and nimble tools.
I was going to do it myself but the build scripts you made are incompatible with node 17.x.x (it requires exporting `NODE_OPTIONS=--openssl-legacy-provider`), and they also seem to assume that `react-scripts`, etc. are in the local environment, rather than including them portably as a yarn package dependency and then doing `yarn exec <xyz>`. There's too much weirdness here and I'm not familiar enough with the systems involved to even begin looking into making it compatible (I started, and then realised that I'm supposed to be relaxing from my fulltime job, not dealing with more weird new tech systems that don't behave sensibly).
Later that afternoon, Aunt Polly arrived home to an unpainted fence.
But then you come to something where there is only one way to do that thing, or the competition has some countervailing disadvantage, and suddenly Bob from accounts knows how to use AS/400.
The Internet, WWW, and Google were once power-user tools. Global education has increased only modestly. The biggest change has been in lowering barriers to ease of use, including but not limited to the cost of tools.
This isn't an unalloyed blessing --- the minimum viable user is both a blessing and curse:
https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/69wk8y/the_tyr...