Anne Wojcicki has been upfront with this strategy for many years, even in a fantastic podcast with YC back in 2018: https://www.ycombinator.com/library/5I-on-starting-and-scali...
> If I have the world's health information, what could I do? And people were like, "Well, you could cure, you could save, you'd know a lot." The idea really was, well, we should do that.
> The idea really was, well, we should do that. Instead of relying on Stanford or Harvard or Pfizer to go and solve a disease or how to be healthy, we the people, we can do it.
When you use language like "we the people", users assume they'll be part of it. Not that Anne will be monetizing their data years later.
I also doubt many consumer read this interview or had any idea their data would be used this way. Maybe it's their fault for not reading the ToS carefully enough, but it's pretty hard for most people to really understand a ToS and also think about how the data could be used in the future.
Pedantically, yes "we the people" are part of it - we gave the company our DNA sample. Not sure what you're trying to say?
> As part of the collaboration, GSK can also change the way we invite patients into clinical trials. The genetic and disease information 23andMe customers share will allow us to identify the kind of patients who are most likely to respond well to new treatments so that 23andMe can invite customers who have consented to be contacted to participate in studies that are relevant to them. This could significantly shorten recruitment and reduce clinical development timelines, allowing some medicines to be delivered to patients faster.
https://us.gsk.com/en-us/behind-the-science/innovation/you-m...
I'm not sure what the "news" is.
Number of genotyped customers:
FY18A: 2.4M
FY19A: 3.4M
FY20A: 2.0M
FY21A: 1.5M
FY22Q1: 0.3M
Wojcicki claimed it was the privacy concerns in a WSJ interview from 2019: https://archive.md/E1Zqw