Robot Uses Lasers to Kill 100k Weeds/Hour, Saving Land from Toxic Herbicides
forbes.com
forbes.com
Most plants must be planted with the right spacing to maximize yield. Plant too close and the plants will overcrowd eachother and block eachothers light and yield will decrease.
However, not every plant gets the best start in life. Some may grow slowly or not at all, have roots hit a rock, or have a host of other issues.
By deliberately planting the seeds 'too close', but then deliberately killing the ones who don't get off to a great start, you can actually get an even higher crop yield.
As soon as lasers on farm machinery are common, this can be done at scale.
I believe they're using hyperbole to market their robot. But with field applications costing on the order of $10 per acre, it has to be a very cheap robot to run, to compete with that.
There is a growing body of evidence that the main ingredient in roundup (glyphosate) is pretty harmless, but that the other non-active ingredients have a pretty substantial environmental and health risk, especially at high doses.
[1] - https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=si...
Their solution has three robots named Tom, Dick, and Harry. Tom maps the field, assessing soil conditions and weeds. Dick zaps weeds. And Harry is the haulier of nutrients for crops.
Surely it won't take long for camera-resistant weeds to evolve? They will learn to avoid detection via camoflage and mimicry. Still, I guess it's a better problem to have than a chemical arms race.
[1] https://www.indefenseofplants.com/blog/2016/2/2/the-accident... [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vavilovian_mimicry