Google could care less about Reader

I think they mean "couldn't" and the fact that one of their less popular apps doesn't support one of their newly-launched beta apps isn't a big surprise.

I'm one of the people who desperately want this added, but I'm not freaking out over it and claiming Google doesn't care.

"Couldn't" as in the contraction of "Could not", carrying the implication that google is incapable of caring less about Reader than it currently does.

Integration is one of the biggest bugbears I have with Google plus. All of the tools I use to consume media support Facebook and Twitter, but none support Google plus. Last week I quit Facebook for G+, and while I put up with having to sign in and post manually, it would be an awful lot better if I could share from flipboard, zite, instapaper or even a bookmarklet.

But they did add the new top navigation bar. And I'm sure adding Google+ to that list of send to items is not as simple as it sounds. Because Circles is the best new feature of G+, so there's at least one more step to sending something to G+ than there is to any of those other services.

I'm hoping there's a deeper integration in store than just being able to add it from that list, though. The native "share item" link/button with keyboard shortcuts, hopefully.

And also some sort of unification of Buzz and Reader with G+, so comments on all three are available on all three. (They should probably just kill Buzz altogether?)

I like the G+ interface and all, but honestly Reader is a lot faster and denser and I'm able to get through a lot of information a lot faster. I'm sort of hoping eventually I won't actually have to go to G+ at all.

Another interesting thing with Google Reader is that the mobile web app is ten times better than the native Android app. Wonder why they bother keeping both.

My apologies on the poor phrasing. Yes, "couldn't" is what I should have said. But, I think you get the point.

>could care less

wat