Some Whales Can Eat Upwards of 16 Tons of Tiny Shrimp a Day
smithsonianmag.com
smithsonianmag.com
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/11/whaling-...
But in the scheme of things, animals aren’t really that big a deal:
> Of the 550 gigatons of biomass carbon on Earth, animals make up about 2 gigatons, with insects comprising half of that and fish taking up another 0.7 gigatons. Everything else, including mammals, birds, nematodes and mollusks are roughly 0.3 gigatons, with humans weighing in at 0.06 gigatons.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/humans-make-110000...
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/all-the-biomass-of-earth-in...
One has to see the bottom portion to realize the bigger contributing components of 'Biomass of Life'.. Plants, Bacterias etc.
The original research paper:
At that time, perhaps. If average human mass is 30 kg, with 8 billion of us, we mass about 0.24 Gt.
So it makes sense to consider the ant colony to be one "organism", and yes, it's very much a long-lived, intelligent and massive organism.
And just now we are gaining awareness of how we can change the environment in a deliberate way.
See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caridoid_escape_reaction
tldr; I've never read Overshoot either but I thought the post had an interesting perspective
That said, if you really can’t tell, does it matter? Shouldn’t we be judging comments on their content, not on who (or what) we think wrote them?
I believe a hint of metaphor there compares humanity as a whole to a relatively autonomous process. If 'Caton' does not clarify a frame for you, compare a pessimistic Adam Curtis. Caton enters as a riff on 'detritis'.
It’s just that we don’t have conscious control of it. Our autonomic functions will adapt to the environment we perceive and act without explicit direction from our conscious selves.
Human is just the top layer of our brains. There are a ton of layered functions making it work.
Whales cultivated them for consumption.
Any shithead who hunts these magnificent animals deserves to be locked up for life
It helps to be 200 tonnes though, or to grow from 3 to 200 tonnes in 10-15 years (3 to 20 in the 6~8 months weaning period, blue whales are estimated to produce >200kg milk a day).
It's not impossible, but I'd say pretty rare to find someone who can do so.
Whales still need to eat a lot, because they only eat for a few months per year, so those reserves need to last for a long time, including, possibly, a pregnancy.
And of course, building and maintaining a body of 10 or more metric tons requires a lot of food to begin with.
(Yes, obviously this wouldn't work so well for humans. Whales have adapted to it, have economies of scale, and the water supports their weight "for free".)
But, seriously, 16 tons per day. That's crazy. That's a LOT of shrimp in the ocean.
Um, the whales are not creating iron. They are eating it and putting (some of) it back where it came from. This articles makes it seem like the more they eat the more iron is there.
A dead krill will release the exact same nutrients into the ocean - it's not necessary for it to be processed by a whale first.
"you might think that these hungry giants could make life in the sea scarcer. In fact, scientists theorize, just the opposite may be true."
This theory is not supported by the explanation given. I see no difference between krill eaten by a whale, and krill dying of old age - both will fertilize phytoplankton.
But I take your point.
The shameful thing is that we have learned how to commercially harvest krill and sell it as animal feed. Which means we are strip-mining this resource also from the ocean. Which before too long will lead to starving the whales to death, followed by the collapse of the krill populations because we just take, we don't give back.
'animal feed' includes pet food.