The thing that really is baffling about this article is that whenever I see saccharine, unspecific, obtuse, corporate language like this, I at least understand why the language is the way it is. Usually it's some company is in hot water and is trying to make sure no one can quote a single line in their press release.

But... Why would Mozilla be trying to obfuscate setting the color of the browser? What's to gain from that? I assume someone looked at this blog post, maybe even multiple people? And then, I assume, thought to themselves: "Yup, this communicated what I want to communicate."

But it's hard for me to imagine an audience that would be receptive to ... this.