Use YouTube to improve your English pronunciation
youglish.com
youglish.com
I go to Youglish whenever I have no idea on how to pronounce a word. I read English much more than I listen to English (HN contributes to that), so it is not uncommon to find such words. I don’t need (nor want) to find the right accent to emulate or reach the perfect pronunciation to pass for a native speaker. I just want to be able to pronounce in a way that my coworkers will understand which word I am using.
My coworkers are kind and reasonable, so they don’t expect perfect pronunciation from me either, they just want to understand the words that are coming out of my mouth.
So, for me, it is not relevant at all that the accents might be mixed. As long as I learn a way to pronounce it, no matter which way. Youglish is a great resource for me.
(another is Grammarly, I stil don’t know why they don’t direct they marketing to non-native English speakers more, as it is perfect for us)
Another tip from me: Deepl.com
Way better than Babelfish. Best translator tool there is in my point of view.
Another language tool I love and use daily is https://www.powerthesaurus.org
Many like them and parent use entertainment media to improve their vocabulary and other language skills, There have been couple of need-gaps[1][2] on this posted on problem validation platform with several solutions like Youglish.
[1] 'Teach me vocabulary without spending extra time' - https://needgap.com/problems/169-teach-me-vocabulary-without...
[2] 'Show meaning of words in a video' - https://needgap.com/problems/201-show-meaning-of-words-in-a-...
What the hell is an "Uk" accent? So a posh southern English accent would be the same category as a northern one? I get that considering nearly every city has its own dialect of English it would hard to offer some sensible mapping but it still feels kind of wrong.
If I search for the word "climate" in "Uk", "Irish" or "New Zealand" I get the same British English video, otherwise a Scottish English video for US. Don't offer me that many choices if you are going to lump them all together anyway.
Honestly they should have just offered a switch between American English and "British English" (the Received Pronunciation that many learn at school).
Other than that, seems like a great idea and already working reasonably well.
Maybe there is similarities with the varied UK accents?
Meanwhile, the standard "BBC English" Received Pronunciation is actually quite the novelty, comparatively speaking.
[1] https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180206-the-tiny-us-isla...
[2] https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20190623-the-us-island-th...
None of these accents sound remotely alike. Back to the drawing board with this methinks.
> So a posh southern English accent would be the same category as a northern one?
I'm more amused that you think southern England is the posh part :-) Though on a more serious note, we use shorter vowel sounds in the north (in the north we say 'bath', southerners say 'baarth') which can make us harder to understand to those whom English isn't a first language.
I have friends who are Welsh, I have friends who are Australian, my background is Scottish, Irish, and Estuary English.
You learn very quickly that everyone has completely different ways of saying things and that you have to accept it. I can't imagine trying to define all of them, it's utter chaos.
Isn't that the stereotype? I thought London area is considered pretty posh. At least that is what I am getting from most popular culture. Of course both dimensions, class and location are partly independent but there is some overlap.
For example, this classic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-BVgPeZR-Y (Posh family reacts to northern nanny | The Catherine Tate Show)
> Though on a more serious note, we use shorter vowel sounds in the north (in the north we say 'bath', southerners say 'baarth') which can make us harder to understand to those whom English isn't a first language.
Yeah, as a non native speaker I need to concentrate way more because it feels faster. I love the accents though, really fun to listen to.
I think what you're getting at is Estuary English, which is spoken around the estuary of the river Thames. It's pretty close to Received Pronunciation which is sort of the 'standard' English as it used to be spoken on the BBC. And probably what most Americans would classify as a posh English accent or even as just 'British English'. London also has Cockney though, which I don't think anyone would say is posh.
Oi, guv, you sayin' East Enders geezers don't speak nice, ye? You havin' a laff, mate?
... Cockney would make me laugh so much, if it weren't for the fact that "certain people" tend to make it thicker when they want to glass you.
More often than I am comfortable with, I am told I'm very easy to understand. I recommend using a middle class Midlands / South Midlands accent when abroad.
English is an international language. It no longer belongs to the oppressor. Don't sell out your culture. German accented English=sex.
if someone speaks my native language with an accent, i wouldn't give a single fuck, but for some reason, every english speak must have a Californian accent.
No they don't! And don't trust anyone who says otherwise.
If you want to improve your English for the ears of native speakers, it's vocabulary, vocabulary, vocabulary, grammar, and vocabulary.
It would be a funny idiosyncrasy for the Brazilian guy to sound Irish to the American co-workers for example.
I agree wholeheartedly with the above sentiments that the idea of "a correct pronunciation" is a toxic colonialist hangover. It's bad enough that we're losing diversity of languages around the world, let's not stamp down on diversity within the de facto world language that is replacing so many of them. Unique spins on world Englishes are the remaining traces of what was lost.
If someone learning our language is irrationally determined to remove their natural (and in many cases quite attractive) accent, there's so many better choices. The 100% neutral of the midwest, or the genteel and calming North Carolina. :)
If I were to learn English as a second language, and wanted to pick an accent, the early 20th century "Mid-Atlantic" would be my choice. (and yes, I know it's entirely fake)
I have seen on multiple occasions, e.g., someone from France struggling to churn out a single fucking intelligible English word out of their mouth - “ooo, what a sexy accent!!”
An Indian speaking impeccable English while being perfectly intelligible but with the distinct Indian accent - “ughh, you’ve a funny accent”. Behind the backs that ughh often becomes yikes.
Use YouTube to improve your English pronunciation - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20225093 - June 2019 (236 comments)
Reminds me of the famous (fictional?) quote of Bush president saying "There is no french word for entrepreneur !" :-)
Since the day knowing this site, I found out that I had pronounced many words incorrectly in the past.
A few things people have pointed out, we have to go through sorting out the accents, multiple pronunciations for the same word, etc... But this is very good for the basic pronunciation search.
> Please come back tomorrow or upgrade to one of YouGlish's Premium account plans.
Well, that was a fun 10 minutes while it lasted... One can definitely have endless fun with this. It's almost like clicking "Random" on Wikipedia except you have to think of a word/phrase first. Or use Wikipedia's "Random" and input that word into YouGlish :D
Sometimes we find that we're both right when the word has multiple pronunciations. Those are the best.
But "correct" pronunciation is community-based: that's where language came from and that's where it remains. The only way for there to be a correct pronunciation is if people name it "Correct Pronunciation".
Shameless plug: I wrote an add-on to use YouGlish with Anki. https://ankiweb.net/shared/info/38866997
But why post this as for English. It supports so many other languages.
I'm studying Chinese and this will help.
From wikipedia
Tried this one off the bat - https://youglish.com/pronounce/elucidation/english?
So, router seems to be pronounced with "UK" selected as "rooter", with "US" selected as "rauter".
The same difference holds for router and router.
As far as I know (and I'm British), for path travelled or a device directing those paths, all BrE speakers rhyme route and router with hoot and hooter.
The power tool, the older manual tool, and the slots they cut, are more obscure. Rout and router should rhyme with shout and shouter in BrE, but I would expect mistakes or guesses for this router.
With shoot/shout, boot/bout, loot/lout, scoot/scout, snoot/snout, toot/tout, in BrE a path travelled should be a root. But there's also brute/flute/jute/lute etc, which could be better written broot/floot/joot/loot, leaving the -ute for words like mute, tribute, minute (small), repute.
But I won't try and fix English in a HN comment.
I was about to write that "one downside of this is that you can only search a word that can be speech recognized"... then I've seen this which kinda blew my mind.
This said - it's probably just a TV thing here.
I'm Canadian. My family is of Scottish, Irish, and English descent. I am painfully aware of how many dialects, exceptions to words, weird pronunciations, and accents affect what should be the same word.
My wife is Russian and is fluent in English from having lived here in Canada since she was a child.
We regularly get into arguments about how something is pronounced. Most of the time, we find that it's commonly said one way here in this part of Canada, but has 1 different pronunciation in a different part of Canada and 3 more pronunciations back in the UK or Australia.
Since Canada is very multi-cultural and there are real Scottish, Irish, Indian, Australian, etc speakers everywhere here, who can say what is the right way to say a word in English?
Can we really say that the word is supposed to be X when I have 5 people in the room, all with legitimate other ways to say it that are true for their version of English? Who is right? Does it matter who is right? How much should we care about correct pronunciation at all? It's not even a pedantic discussion anymore for me, it's a legitimate and real confusion day-to-day.
As an example, I went to the above linked "youglish" site and it gave a suggestion for "courage". Some semi-British, possibly Eastern US sounding person said "coo-rah-dg" but here in my part of Canada, I would say it as "cur-ah-dg". They sound rather different and in passing, you might even think I'm saying a different word than "courage". Both are right, but here is a website that will cause someone to tell me my pronunciation is wrong.
I feel like English is too broken and disparate in its many acceptable spoken variations to have a site like this ever work without stoking further arguments.
This has happened - English at the core is based on German (an old German not spoken anymore - and one we probably can't reconstruct), but the French and other influences over the years mean few can find anything in common with German (which has gone a different way). I could also point out Spanish/Italian, or Swedish/Danish. I have no doubt that you can find the same in Africa and Asia, but I don't know enough about their languages to comment.
While we are at it, can we reform English spelling to make sense?
It is probably unpreventable. Language change occurs precisely because of insufficient contact/exposure, causing divergence, or allowing it to persist. Dialects with lots of bidirectional exchange tend to shift towards each other.
Besides, that ship sailed. English dialects have arisen on multiple continents and are diverging. I speak fairly standard Canadian English and there some dialects I need a fair bit of time to acclimate to when I encounter them. Unless electronic media and social change pulls some wildcard on language acquisition (who knows?) it's quite possible that in a few hundred more years the gap between spoken English on the street in New York and London may be as wide as German and Dutch today.
This is just plain wrong, or at the very least very misleading. It's true that English is at its core a Germanic language. As is German, but it's fairer to say that both languages share a common ancestor. And in fact, we can and have reconstructed these older ancestor languages. In fact, most European languages descend from Proto-Indo-European, which has also been reconstructed to quite some detail.
I can heartily recommend this podcast[1] by the way, which goes into a lot more detail about this as well as the history of how these things got discovered.
Well that's the wrong way to look at it. There's not one objectively correct pronunciation but there are a great many objectively totally incorrect ones.
I've got an horrible french accent when I speak english and it's just obviously and non-disputably wrong and bogus.
My daughter, on the other hand, has been raised watching english-only cartoons and going since years to british colleges and she definitely has an accent that many would think is native.
The goal shouldn't be to get the "correct" pronunciation: the goal should be to not get an incorrect one.
While I admire your want to not have the “incorrect” pronunciation. I don’t think it’s necessary or even really all that important.
Don’t let great be the enemy of good and all that.
I call this a win as it makes me more accepting of others instead of trying to be “right” like so many native English speakers try to be (which is incredibly obnoxious and elitist).
Take for example "Regina", I've always pronouced it re-gih-na, how Regina Saskatchewan was pronounced on CBC and elsewhere.
But here was a lady with same name of Regina who pronounced it re-gi-nah which I guess is more common south of the border?
[EDIT: "cawk" is a better rendition of AmE. ]
I’m sure that’s reciprocated on more that a few cases too. :D
- succinct
- mischievous
- coup de grace
- comptroller