California legalized weed 5 years ago, but illicit market still thrives
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Massive taxation on legal dispensaries combined with relatively lax enforcement of illegal distribution is, of course, going to make the legal operations a tough sell.
What I didn’t realize is that some of these illegal dispensaries are apparently operating out in the open, out of actual storefronts according to this article. If enforcement is that lax and the legal route is taxed to an extreme then the outcome isn’t really surprising.
You can either destroy the illicit market or you can make insane amount of money off regulation, pick one. Destroying the illicit market will require making dispensaries competitive with illicit shops so taxes and other regulations will have to come way way down. California seems to have chosen the latter option of just making a ton of tax revenue off the industry rather than using the industry as a way to crush the illicit market.
No one in the legislature must have taken economics or they must have a "Dan Btlzerian" outlook on business, because all they seem to want to do is milk the industry for everything it's worth.
Pretty soon they are going to have neither, because the solution was crushed under the weight of everyone wanting to have their hand in the pie and take their share. California leadership is still under the delusion that they can just keep taking and taking from this industry but somehow that industry will still stay afloat and thrive.
It is not. The Feds, if they legalized could put federal enforcement there, or somewhere else.
In California, enforcement is in the Department of Cannabis Control.
> ATF also has some pretty sweeping powers that may be tough to replicate (legally) on a state by state basis.
Because the federal government is mote Constitutionally restrained than state governments and has a Constitution that is more difficult to change, its much easier to create state agencies with sweeping powers (within the state) than federal ones.