Just always feels like a missed opportunity to provide actual meaningful data.
Just always feels like a missed opportunity to provide actual meaningful data.
But only by single location, I'm not sure if you've been near a chicken processing plant, but they are very often clustered together, shockingly near where an abundance of commercial chicken farms are, so knowing the percentage chance by an area can be very useful.
I don't think my perspective and interest seem to be aligning with most people commenting here.
I'm not concerned about if a random package of chicken is OK, I'm concerned about a cluster of processors.
I'm not sure what you are considering, but I can't see how if I can look it up by full address, being able to lookup multiple by zip would change the representation of data, or change its usefulness?
Just type in the state abbreviation.
The search box lets you search any part of the address. You need to use proper abbreviations for example, but I don't see how you wouldn't be able to find a plant by state.
Just seems this could have been done a lot better, with very little effort.