Open Source Fact and Fiction: HP Should Open Source WebOS
networkworld.com
networkworld.com
Have a look at Google's strategy. Google maintains an open source mobile OS as a strategy for controlling the platform that delivers their product to consumers. Along with this major benefit, there are other strategic benefits as well. Giving away Android applies pressure to other competitors that encroach on Google's search product (Microsoft Bing) and other developing markets (Apple, Amazon, Facebook, etc).
HP has, until recently, been a hardware company. It's hard to make a case for open sourcing the mobile OS you just paid $1.2bn for when there's the very real possibility that your competitors will pick it up and make a better device than you.
I guess I need help seeing the strategic benefit to HP for open sourcing webOS. The two ways I see them extracting shareholder value are:
* Selling the Palm patent portfolio outright
* Identifying companies that encroach on their patents and extracting licensing fees
I mean, they could even make it more open than Android, completely transparent development. I would probably contribute to the project.