So are you deprecating the term "Turing Complete"? Mighty bold move there. And on that same note, have you seen the stuff being done in Minecraft? It is quite up for debate whether it is a programming language.
No. It’s still an interesting yard stick. It just doesn’t describe programming languages in full. For example, and someone counterintuitively, it is actually possible to design a programming language that isn’t Turing complete. Some esoteric functional languages do actually fall into that category. But generally programming languages would be a subset of Turing complete software.
> And on that same note, have you seen the stuff being done in Minecraft?
I have, hence why I cited it as an example.
> It is quite up for debate whether it is a programming language.
One could debate anything but it doesn’t mean the argument is made in good faith.
Minecraft is a game. I’m happy to even extend the definition and say it’s supports some visual programming mechanics. But that doesn’t mean it is a programming language.
Just because something has 4 legs and a tail, it doesn’t automatically mean it is a dog.