Are Keyboards on Laptops the Next Thing to Go?
technologyreview.com
technologyreview.com
There are human computer interfaces for different computer sizes. The mouse and keyboard are good for "human scale" devices like the desktop and laptop. Touch is great for pocket sized devices, and motion is good for even larger devices. The mouse and keyboard aren't going away, it's just that we'll have more non-"human scale" devices.
I have a tablet. So often I try to type on it & use a terminal, and it is terrible. I get used to the size and key configuration but what I have problem with is hitting my fingers in the glass surface repeatedly. Doing it for a minute or two is ok. Doing for an hour is painful.
Also noticed on a tablet I become more of a passive consumer of a information -- I read mostly. On the desktop I am more inclined to produce -- I write code, type comments, write email.
As I mention in my upcoming book on blogging, my workflow works exactly like that and I definitely recommend it. I mostly produce on my MacBook Pro, while I use the iPad to consume information and stay up to date at night, thanks to apps like Reeder and Flipboard. This way I keep work and "play" (well, less crucial work) separate.
Not that I expect my target audience (people fighting attention deficit in dementia or in childhood) to type for hours every day, but I wonder if this might be a way to improve the experience and accuracy of typing on the whole: haptic/sonic feedback...
Removing this possibility would make typing a _lot_ harder.
Feeling different vibrations when your fingers at those places would impart the same information. e.g. if _ is vibration, and a space is no vibration, the function keys would feel like this:
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___I'm happy to give it a go, but it really is going to have to be very impressive to allow touch typists to function.
(Reminds me of arthur dent, zapped to the RatEotU, encountering pain where-ever he touched his body, and eventually realizing it was his finger that hurt).
I wonder, if it responding fast enough, you could brush your finger across it, and it would feel like there was a pattern on the surface (by it vibrating/not depending on where your finger was)... Sort of a zero-dimensional display. Of course, wouldn't work for multi-touch (though the haptic patent does seem to manage this, by creating a waveform whose peak is sharply localized).
Doing it right would probably require some sort of truly flexible (and incredibly resillient) display, with some sort of adaptive force-feedback (matrix of tiny pistons with pressure control, or something)
The patently apple article linked gives a bit more detail about the image presented, but it still looks very low resolution (although there looks to be some novelty in suppressing feedback from surrounding haptic elements)
That being said, I'm quite certain this is the future. At least for mainstream users.
Which might, I suspect, be up there with affordable tabletop cold fusion.
Most laptop (and desktop) keyboards are pretty horrible already. So I'm sure that the final step to these awful abominations is not far away. Depressing.
The advantage with virtual keyboard is the infinite reconfiguration capabilities w.r.t. repositioning of keys for reasons of ergonomics.
For the same reasons, though, keyboards designed with ergonomics in mind (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergonomic_keyboard) can't be replicated because of size and three-dimensional profile.
P.S. I'm referring not just, or primarily, to the force applied, but the the suddenness of the transition to full pressure (cushioned only by one's soft tissue).