Edward Snowden on corporate media hiring surveillance state operatives and liars
twitter.com
twitter.com
Fixed it for you.
Aren’t the major media and news outlets owned by only handful of people? They won’t dare risk pissing off the government.
The more concentrated media is, the fewer families TPTB need to threaten with violence for not keeping the newspapers on message. It's really very convenient.
They are uniformly obsessed with the pandemic. Frightened. Paranoid.
They work hard to keep you afraid or angry and tuned in.
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/04/18/at-un-aaron-mate-debunks-...
But CNN doesn't want to talk about actions you can take to fix problems they tell you you have, because if you do you will be carrying out actions and doing verbs instead of watching television. It's basically an attention thing, advertising only works if people are paying attention, and different shows get it in different ways.
Comedians get attention by telling jokes.
Action movies get attention by (generalizing) showing a single hero or heroine take down a conspiracy of over 50 people. I'd estimate 90% of action movies involve a struggle against a conspiracy. The exception that proves the rule is No Country for Old Men, because the bad guy was a lone wolf, but I can't think of any others. In fiction it allows for plots where it makes sense for a single star to be in fight scenes against "henchmen", which is of course a conspirator, especially in fights where he's outnumbered. This gives more drama and sense of risk, over and over again. And I sense that people really find the struggle against conspiracies gratifying to watch, there's some really profound identification there.
And news channels get attention by rankling you. And it also involves conspiracies, without actually using that word because it's super taboo. When Biden went into office the news channels had problems coming up with enough "content" because they could no longer put negative coverage, and fake news, and lies, and occasionally some little nuggets of truth too, about Donald Trump around the clock. He was keeping them in business, very good for their bottom line. There's an element of hatred here, too, they absolutely desire that. They want you to refuse to cooperate, and always oppose, the bad guys of the movie that is CNN, which is really the basic biological function of hatred.
The bigger picture is, what is CNN selling? Well, they barely have any formal ads. I believe their ads in Chile are for that Emirates airline, and occasionally they have a "technology" feature which is pitching some electronics. So what are they selling? I think the viewer's votes. They have ways of measuring how many brain stems they have hooked up to their Matrix, they can give credible estimates of how much they can swing an election. Eyeballing it, I'd say CNN can swing a presidential election by .1%, which is a huge amount.
- The Last Action Hero
- Robocop
- Karate Kid
- Baby Driver
- Rocky
- The Revenant
- Mad Max
- ConAir
- Terminator
Karate Kid had the Cobra Cai, I think it was called, the rival school. I didn't see it, but I believe they were bullies. Maybe you're right about that one, although I think Daniel-san triumphs against a bully, there might have been several, or the bully had little supporters. It's a coming of age movie, though. It's also a sports movie, they do Karate-Do, which is for decorative, spirital, and sport purposes, not Karate-Jutsu, the military or let's call it "action".
Robocop, there's that company that makes the robot that Robocop has to fight in the end, there's a lot of people working in that company and together they built an automatic murder machine, which they then set loose. And IIRC they're doing a housing development and have ties to the criminal activity in the city Robocop tries to clean up. And like that evil robot had missiles coming out of its back I think, the special effects were glitchy, which made it look like an even greater monstrosity. Companies are groups of persons so absolutely can be guilty of conspiracy if the facts warrant it, incorporation documents don't give permission to traffic heroin. So it happens to fronts for drug dealing and it almost happened to Abbott Laboratories, also basically for drug dealing, only with a drug patients hated instead of craving.
Rocky does not involve a conspiracy, except of course the conspiracy that Rocky works for, the mob, as a debt collector. Which is the reason behind his conflict with Mickey, while Rocky says "it's a living" Mickey replies "it's a waste of life!" But I think I can hand you this one. One catch: this is a sports movie, not an action movie.
I haven't seen the others.
[1] gang is a well-marketed and very glamourous word for conspiracy, which is the term courts use when there's the formal elements of a conspiracy: meeting of the minds, two or more participants in a crime acting in coordination, there's a third one [EDIT: secrecy, and illegality or bad faith are others] but that's the gist of it, it just means criminal teamwork. Some things you do alone, some things with others, same goes for crime...at any rate, don't accuse someone of being a conspiracy theorist to a judge. Judges deal with conspiracies continually, sometimes multiple different ones per day, and there absolutely are people trying to play that judge by "covering" for each other. You will curry zero favor with that judge by putting the word "conspiracy" in your opponents mouth and then claim he must be delusional. That always works on talk TV, but not in court. Judges simply don't have the luxury of being able to pretend criminals never cooperate, like none of them had a single friend.
Saying that Robocop isn't about a conspiracy strikes me as bizarre - the whole thing was a government contractor abusing its power.
I think your take on Terminator is a little weird - Arnold isn't the hero, and the gang fight is a complete throw away; that doesn't make it a conspiracy movie. T2 is more so, with the secret use of future tech.
So what this film is doing is using a small wannabe conspiracy to raise the status of the true villain of the movie. But there's no intention of the losers being the good guy, at this point Arnold's the closest to being the good guy.
Whether or not we call the group a conspiracy, the scene doesn't make the broader case.
A conspiracy theory dynamic was shoehorned into the Minority Report movie (the short story is very different).
Hydra stuff in recent MCU comes to mind.
Predator is an interesting inversion in that, while there is a bit of CIA backstabbing, the real conspiracy relevant to the conjecture above is actually "our heroes", who are eliminated by the single antagonist until the climactic fight. I guess that's kind of a horror thing, though?
- The Island
- The Truman Show
- Capricorn One
- Alternative 3
- The Parallax View
- The Anderson Tapes
- THX 1138
edit: depending on how you look at it
- Contact
You need to calm down and read what's actually written, otherwise you're going to make liberals look like uneducated, unhinged, lunatics.
I can be critical of CNN without praising Fox News....
You equally took my comment out of context. Maybe you should calm down? :-)
It's always on in their house.
They are uniformly obsessed with the election and Donald Trump.
Frightened. Paranoid.
They truly believe that the election was stolen by hundreds of thousands of votes from dead people and South American immigrants who have never stepped foot even into the lower bounds of North American Mexico. That Trump is still, by the constitution, our sitting president.
They truly believe that the majority of liberal leaning college students grow up to eat babies, have abortions for fun, and have regular satanic rituals in their basements (lol, it's funny because they can't afford houses with a basement)
I don't particularly understand the urgency of the nature of your statement. There's definitely some urgency surrounding mine as uncalled for as it is though, as these people openly talk about wanting to massacre their opposition. Your side really just wants people to wear a mask and get a safe vaccination.
It's hilarious that people like you will underplay the issue of misinformation when it's disseminated about COVID when there has been no single bigger political issue in the world for the past 2 years. Restrictions put in place are not costless and have real impact on people's lives.
As for your laundry list of crazed conspiracy theories, I have a hard time believing that Fox News has been publishing them. So they don't seem analogous to results of CNN coverage. They sound far more like the sort of thing that propagates from 4chan into social media. Regardless, they can't be that common as you have also said they intend to massacre their opponents. Seeing as we're 10 months into the Biden presidency you'd think we'd have started seeing these massacres by now. Maybe they're like the next Jan 6th the FBI is always warning against, always another month away.
https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-misinformation-is-dis...
Most of these people are waiting for orders by their "glorious leader" and grifting ilk. Do you just dissociate from when the last president had a speech telling them to walk across the lawn to the Capitol building and fight their way to overturn the "unfair election" that resulted in an armored police officer beaten to fucking death? JK, he must've gotten paid to be a crisis actor and die, right?
Do you know what is required to beat somebody in body armor to death? Especially when they're surrounded by other cops...?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/27/when-do-w...
_
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-joe-biden-police-tex...
_
https://mobile.twitter.com/PDXzane/status/142960643503006105...
https://www.opb.org/article/2021/08/22/far-right-activists-c...
_
https://mobile.twitter.com/mxtaliajane/status/14343079853591...
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlissaAzar/status/145283865870521...
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlissaAzar/status/143467974340884...
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlissaAzar/status/143467974918442...
As for the rest of what you've mentioned, it will be addressed in a lower comment at a later time in which I'm not so tired.
p.s.
Notice that I made absolutely no comment on the coverage of COVID by CNN or anybody.
You respond to a post about CNN, question the 'urgency' of the criticism and then claim that you've made 'no comment' about CNN coverage. Read your own post, you directly claim it is less important than your perceived threat of right wing extremism. The fact that you replied this way shows how mired you are in partisan politics. The opposite to CNN isn't Fox News.
A few tweets isn't going to change my mind about the extent of the threat. Trump was able to rustle up around 3000 crazy people to breach the Capitol in a nation of 300+ million. I would wager Al Gore would have been able to get people to do this if he was as deranged as Trump. It really tells us nothing. As for your tweets showing violence at the Olympia protest, am I supposed to believe this is representative? Because if I am then I'd have to conclude far left extremism is the greater threat considering a counter-protestor shot someone. To be clear, I am not denying the existence of extremists I am questioning whether they are as numerous as journalists are trying to convince you they are.
You can ridicule people for raising questions about the FBI's involvement in Jan 6th all you want but the only people to blame for this are the FBI themselves. They have shown themselves perfectly willing to celebrate foiling plots that they essentially created whether it was after 9/11 or as recently as the Whitmer 'assassination plot' which was 50% FBI agents and organised at an FBI funded event [3]. Everyone should treat what the CIA, NSA and FBI say with extreme scepticism, regardless of your politics.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/us/who-died-in-capitol-bu... [2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/brian-sic... [3] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kenbensinger/michigan-k...
lol
> Everyone should treat what the CIA, NSA and FBI say with extreme scepticism, regardless of your politics.
Once again, the fact you make the presumption that any HN user doesn't already do this to the extreme is hilarious.
lol @ the rest of your rambling in general
Go touch grass and please get a credible education, it will help you in life.
You spread lies and then resort to the most generic ad hom questioning my education and telling me to touch grass. Maybe get off Twitter and meet some people in the real world, you might find most of the country isn't trying to kill you as you claim.
We shall see.
Cable news is trash.
Basically a guy is sitting in country A and criticizing media of country B while getting both legal and financial support from country A. While he keeps dead quiet about the media practices of country A. While country A sees country B as a strategic adversary.
This thing quacks very much like a duck and, since we should be mindful of the media we consume, shouldn’t we take his messages with a pinch of salt?
Look at the current state of surveillance. It's sickening.
The reason why he's in Russia and not buried in an unmarked ditch is because Russia considers exposing Americas equal hypocrisy to be politically useful.
This is why nobody takes him or his supporters seriously.
Who are you trying to convince?
Even in the tech community, the most sympathetic group possible, half the people revile him as a self-serving traitor.
Nobody takes him or his supporters serious. Hard to hear, I know.
Bill Browder talks about what happened to him when he pissed off the most powerful people in Russia. I don't admire the guy, basically he figured out every story he could get into the WSJ or Nytimes made them $41M in preventing stock shenanigans like massive dilution so that his shares actually could appreciate from the rapidly growing Russia economy, so that was his whole angle, shaming those guys in the paper. It's not clear it was truth, or whether it was slander, there was shady business going on, but he's no saint. When a news article is worth $41 million, like how much is that per word, and are you going to get a PR person to review the words, check if you can't get the article to be worth $42M in stock? Are you sure it's exactly $41M? Can't you just give it a little nuance, use a thesaurus maybe? Besides, damningly, he gave up his US citizenship to avoid paying taxes (like he obviously doesn't say that because tax lawyers tell you if you say that you are forbidden from ever setting foot in America for life), and that backfired because that means you are forfeiting America's protection and help because you didn't want to contribute back into the system. And he now can't make political contributions as a citizen, which I'm getting to.
He got kicked out of Russia, which makes perfect sense, like this guy thinks he milk American institutions, totally imperialistically meaning imposing American values on Russian companies, for no other reason but to make billions of dollars, and hoard that wealth with cunning tax evasion (guys like this absolutely don't pay taxes for ten years after you stop being a citizen, though that's the law, and to my understanding they literally value the money they pay in taxes 0%, or even negative). And USA actually is fine with you going to some banana republic and lording it over them, I mean it's perverse, but it's happened many many times in US history. And that's precisely why you still have to pay taxes if you're overseas if you're American, though in practice you only pay if you are upper class in a foreign country, which is by design. Or what, you expect the embassies to evacuate you after you caused a revolution, or you want American marines to force a country to redo an election you didn't like, that costs money that has to come from taxes, you don't want to pay anything for that?
And that guy is an activist now, he got some other citizenships, he lobbied all kinds of governments to punish a few of Putin's, like, he calls them henchmen or something, maybe they are, I don't know, it's always the same 7 guys and nobody else so they can't get bank accounts, they're the ones who seem to have beaten his lawyer to death. And he says, he's gotten 7 red notices from Interpol from Russia, it's a huge problem if you get just one.
It's realistic for him to expect to be assassinated, he says in his book he could have 1000 bodyguards and it wouldn't matter, Putin could get him anyway, and he has other strategies to protect himself. And several assassinations have been attributed to Russia in the last ten years, in London a few times, I think in London repeatedly, the nerve gas some years ago was attributed to them, some polonium in someone's tea, it's a realistic outcome if you're enough of a thorn in a powerful someone's side.
So one viable strategy is, piss people off less.
Damn you made me think even less of Snowden. You should tell more people about Bill Browder's story.
He just spent too much of his life doing nothing other than serving his true nation, his pocket. So he grows up in America--that's already a privilege in my book. I think he went to Colorado, then Stanford for Business School. This was in the 80s, so Stanford was earning huge amounts of funding from the Department of Defense for all kinds of crazy cold war tech, and there was so much trust and mutual benefit in this relationship that the DoD...I don't know how to communicate it, but let Stanford charge "overhead" which went to the school in general. So the electrical engineering students in particular would make a breakthrough, and they'd get paid well, but then the money sloshed around the whole school. The Cold War was when Stanford went from a respectable, but second-tier school to a first-tier school, and it could really make its huge campus look like a billion bucks. So Browder goes to Business School in Stanford, and then the Cold War ends, so he goes to Eastern Europe and then Russia, like he himself said because his parents and grandparents were the most famous communists in America, he'd become the biggest capitalist in Russia. So, would he become Russian then? Would he stay in Russia and learn Russian? Will deriving a fortune, we're talking billions, from Russia, help Russia in some roundabout way? Because additionally, IIRC he gave up his US citizenship in the early nineties, like right away, he did not want to get caught dead paying taxes. And he didn't pay shit. He made billions, his fund was one of the fastest growing in the nineties, and apparently he flew from Britain, where he had become a citizen (I think you can't just not have a citizenship, I think you can't drop a citizenship without securing another one first). He flew to Russia all the time.
And I consider credible that Russia was a gangster-driven economy. This is actually not that surprising or, frankly even evil in the specific circumstances, it's just a consequence of the black market being the only market, so a return to market economics would have to come from the black market expanding and part of it getting split off into a gray and a white market. It's just not realistic to expect hard-line Communists to adapt to a market system they've been fighting their whole lives and expect them to have the combination of skills needed to address all the challenges that face a capitalist.
Whereas the black marketer actually has those skills right now, they're not meaningfully worse skills because he was selling Beatles's records or passports or rare books, the point is he's selling, he's bargaining, he's negotiating, he's in the market and getting a feel for the market, he's sometimes speculating, and you need that too, and that's a really tricky thing, and the market needs good speculators in order to smooth out the booms and busts. Keep in mind, under the thesis that Russia is run by gangster capitalists, it still puts a very high price on its national security and isn't selling itself out to other countries, it preserved a huge degree of autonomy and sovereignty to the point Russia could take in Snowden despite America's pressure against it. So at the very least, there's some patriotism. Moreso than Browder for sure.
Further, when the government basically collapsed people needed to eat, and the arrangement was they had all this stock, perhaps entitled to dividends, but nothing to eat, pretty much, really struggling. They were used to getting their rations (Socialism you get rations and you wait a long time in line), until they didn't. So my understanding is the black marketeers used their growing black market--and remember, because under Socialism pretty much any good an American could normally buy with money was sold in the black market instead, this was the seed from which the Russian economy was born, there was no other way for it to go but this-to make sure people could survive this catastrophe. And it sounds like it was fucking hard work, like can you imagine the logistics, roads must have been going to pot, exchanging goods using Vodka as currency, financing it all because those pieces of paper stock certificates were worth little at the beginning of Russian capitalism, and this is food we're talking about so you actually have to make sure everybody gets at least something, I'm not convinced gangster capitalism is really that harmful, well certainly it can be, but black markets are not inferior to white markets if at the end of the day you are actually acting in good faith. For sure black marketers can act in good faith. Black markets also have some built-in advantages over white markets, particularly that nobody asks you to sign demonic contracts in black markets (think arbitration clauses). No contract enforcement can be good to the extent contract enforcement of abusive contracts is bad. Plus, for privacy, you don't have to fill out nosy forms to participate, nobody ever asks you for your social like so many Fortune 500 companies do, they may know you by first name and face and that's it. Buyer and seller might have a remarkable affinity, because to have a desirable rare Rock and Roll record the seller would have to at least have liked the album enough to get it, and the buyer likes the album too, maybe they have something in common. On top of that, the seller is taking a big risk for the sake of the buyer. And I think the biggest thing that conditions markets of any type: what is being exchanged and why? That defines how the interaction will go more than whether the market is illegal according to this guy or grey according to an encyclopedia.
But yeah, I agree with your point about the Russian government political motives.
1. US warned every country in both Europe and South America said to be considering shelter for Snowden of grave consequences should they offer asylum to the whistleblower. Without his US passport, Snowden couldn't go anywhere and Ecuador reversed their safe passage.
2. This also gave political fodder for the establishment cronies to call and label anyone who would defend Snowden a "Russian Agent".
I would recommend reading these two by Glenn Greenwald (he was the journalist who worked with Snowden to publish the docs):
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/ben-rhodes-book-proves-obam...
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/as-anger-toward-belarus-mou...
> Led by then-Vice President Joe Biden, U.S. officials warned every country in both Europe and South America said to be considering shelter for Snowden of grave consequences should they offer asylum to the whistleblower. Threats to Havana caused the Cuban government to rescind its commitment of safe passage they had issued to Snowden's lawyer. Under Biden's pressure, Ecuador also reversed itself by proclaiming the safe passage document issued to Snowden was a mistake.
I would also recommend the Citizen Four documentary:
Related, I also don’t understand why, if the US was able to pressure other countries into withdraw their commitments, they wouldn’t just wait until Snowden was in one of those countries so they could pressure for extradition.
The closest we have to state-owned is NPR, and if you think NPR is the lapdog of the government, you don't listen to NPR very much.
I'm not accusing you of deliberately spreading propaganda, perhaps just repeating what I suppose must seem like an important and logically sound rebuttal to the enemy, known Russian agent Snowden.
Why would Snowden have anything to say about Russia? Do you think he knows or could say something that has not been said by a thousand others? Do you believe he would have knowledge and experience of the state security apparatus in Russia that would give him a unique and important perspective on things? Do you think he is in a better position to criticize Russia than other people?
As I said, it's a propaganda technique. Do we screech at US journalists about why aren't they denouncing the US every time they publish a story about Russia? No.
He keeps his trap shut about our suffering or plays softball at best which effectively makes him a great weapon in FSB/Russian oligarch hands and a RT mouthpiece.