Definition of 'fully vaccinated' could change, CDC chief says. What that means
sfchronicle.com
sfchronicle.com
Absolutely not. It's trivial to go back to earlier this year and find public health officials promising that the vaccines would stop transmission and infection. They may have even been somewhat right until Delta took over (perhaps precisely because it had an evolutionary advantage against mass vaccination?).
But scientifically it was known from the beginning that the vaccines were non-sterilizing [1], so I think any scenario different to the current one of endless boosters was just a fantasy or a "noble lie" to promote vaccination at best.
[1] https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210203-why-vaccinated-p...
I think this was pretty obvious when the first vaccines came out and they weren’t sterilizing.
Then we have to worry about all the mutations, and if we have to keep getting new vaccines for the new variants, in much the same way as we do flu shots.
“No one should have to be stuck with old outdated technology, especially when it comes to their personal health, the health of their families, and the well-being of their communities,” he said. “So, yes, it is likely that boosters will be added to the standard regimen.”
Basic Freedom and Participation in Society As a Service