The Roll-Out of Windows 11 Is the Perfect Time to Decide to Switch to Linux
cheapskatesguide.org
cheapskatesguide.org
Ubuntu still runs a broken Bluetooth stack by default (and they've ignored the reports). HiDPI/multimonitor support seems to be insufficient (based on reports; I don't suffer from it), and there is a sadly realistic long list of issues¹. To say that "Linux has all the utilities you will ever need" is false for a non negligible amount of users; some unique programs are not available on Linux (even Office documents can't be fully handled on Linux with 100% confidence of compatibility).
With that in mind, I personally think that Linux is mature enough for light users (browsing and non-professional Office usage), which I suppose are a significant amount of the userbase.
¹=https://itvision.altervista.org/why.linux.is.not.ready.for.t...
Photoshop and another art software (Clip Studio Paint, for example) require Windows (or a Mac). I could probably get away with using Krita instead (and I do use it on Windows as well) but my drawing tablet (Huion display tablet) doesn’t work on Linux. Somebody wrote a set of scripts for it and it kinda works but you loose some functionality.
There is also the guitar amp & fx modeling software, plus a bunch of other audio softwares that may or may not have a counterpart on Linux. And I did try Wine with mixed results.
So, if you’re just browsing the internet or doing software development, you’re probably good and can migrate, otherwise, that article is maybe too miopic.
https://web.dev/ps-on-the-web/
I believe an offline mode could work
Meanwhile we have CS professors lamenting that the incoming CS students don't know basic computer concepts - like what is a file system? They've been raised on tablets. My takeaway is those under 20 aren't going to be running Linux, either.
That leaves those aged 20-50 remaining. Well, you can pretty much write off those aged 30-50. They're dealing with the classic squeeze - taking care of children on the one hand and taking care of aging parents on the other. They simply don't have time to mess around with something like Linux. They're going to keep using whatever they've been using because it works and they're looking to keep things simple as they struggle with all their family responsibilities.
That leaves those in their 20s. The good news is they have financial limitations so Linux is attractive from that point. The bad news is they're the most susceptible to marketing and branding and Linux just isn't cool (unless you're an über geek).
In other words, the majority of everybody who's ever going to be running Linux on their desktop are already running Linux on their desktop.
Samsung laptops that run Chrome OS look neat but Chrome OS is too restrictive, it doesn't feel like Linux even after their new _run Linux apps on a container_ thing.
I am not sure why IBM/Intel which have vested interests in Linux don't make Laptops that run Linux. Is the market not big enough?
and for a company that badly needs to repair a brand, consumer devices are the best option IMHO.
Again, IBM was only an example that came to my mind. I'm sure there are other companies that would benefit from making a Linux laptop.