Helium: South Africa strikes new 'gold'
phys.org
phys.org
The fact that there are these cities of silicon in our pockets is amazing: https://images.app.goo.gl/qnNSArgbfxPHTyqk7
Also, what happens to an iPhone if you bring it near an ultrasound source with a carefully chosen frequency?
Re ultrasonics - for some MEMS devices yes this can absolutely break things, but because the devices are so small, the resonant frequencies can often be in the hundreds of KHz or even MHz and most ultrasound transducers only produce sub 100khz frequencies
Since this is hacker news, I'm hoping someone could try the ultrasound part.
https://royalheliumltd.com/projects/saskatchewan-helium-play...
But if you mean any kind of presence/impact than even companies quite far away can be found. You can find products made by companies across the globe literally in the device you are using right now. In my opinion that means a lot more than having a storefront by chance near by.
Still, an interesting find, worth looking into.
Business types don’t know what tech pieces to value and have a tendency to squeeze the resources out of the wrong places. It can work for some businesses better than others.
I love it when articles have random units of measurements like that!
Regardless of helium supplies, party balloons are problematic because they tend to escape and contaminate the environment with rubber and plastic. I frequently see empty mylar balloons floating in the ocean.
You can estimate decay rates from net heat generated by the earth, but only a tiny fraction of the helium produced is close enough to the surface to be captured by us. On top of this helium is really good at escaping confinement so you need very specific geological formations to end up with significant quantities.
1 liter of liquid helium expands to .74m^3 of gaseous helium at room temperature. A 16" party balloon has .042 m^3 of space, so requires .05 liters of liquid helium.
So one MRI machine can hold ~30,000 balloons worth of helium and leaks about 39 balloons per day.
Note: This is not to suggest helium that is used for balloons is being redirected from MRI machines. As the article states, helium is captured almost exclusively as a byproduct of natural gas mining and any excess helium not worth capturing is just vented off. Reducing demand for helium by eliminating party balloons would have no affect on the amount of helium that is released from the ground.
If/when it’s not, you might slow down on the helium-rich gas fields and bulk up on the 100% hydrocarbon fields, especially if natural gas is selling for a lot.
... or a stoichiometric mixture of hydrogen+oxygen: https://youtu.be/l9CI6KSV560?t=1625
Interestingly enough, Google told me there are only 14 gasses that are lighter than air. They are:
* acetylene
* ammonia
* carbon monoxide
* diborane
* ethylene
* helium
* hydrogen
* hydrogen cyanide
* hydrogen fluoride
* methane
* methyl lithium
* neon
* nitrogen
* water vapor
Wiki lists most of them at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_gas , although it leaves out ethylene, methyl lithium, and diborane for some reason. It also doesn't explicitly list carbon monoxide, but talks about it under "coal gas."
Of those, only hydrogen and helium are even vaguely suitable for party balloons, due primarily to their nasty chemical properties and/or expense.
Bear in mind that it boils/condenses at about 26C, so it's only suitable for parties with lots of dancing or warm summer nights.
Wow, that got dark quickly.
Give a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Less similar, but another classic of dark humor, is the poster of Stalin captioned:
Dark humor is like food.
Not everyone gets it.
Diborane, among other things, autoignites in an oxygen atmosphere at 38C, and also burns on contact with water. It manages a rare NFPA fire diamond of 4 4 3.
It is tough to be a less practical lifting gas than hydrogen cyanide or hydrogen fluoride, but I think diborane manages it.
>Because of the exothermicity of its reaction with oxygen, diborane has been tested as a rocket propellant.[32] ... Diborane is pyrophoric gas. Commercially available adducts are typically used instead ... The toxic effects of diborane are mitigated because the compound is so unstable in air. The toxicity toward laboratory rats has been investigated.[38]
> HF has actually been used right out of the cylinder for a long time in Merrifield peptide synthesizers. It’s the traditional way to cleave the peptide off the resin at the final step, so there are actually a lot of people who’ve used the stuff. But it’s in a dedicated apparatus that is (that had better be) well sealed, and people treat it with due respect. At a former employer of mine, there was an accident with one of these machines right before I joined the company. The shout “HF LEAK!” went out into the halls, and I’m told that the whole area set a never-to-be-equaled evacuation record.
By the fire diamond metric, HF is relatively tame, at 4 0 1, except that anything with a health rating of 4 ("very short exposure could cause death or major residual injury") is unsuitable for most purposes. So you can't set it on fire. Doesn't matter.
Filling your party balloons with hydrogen is one way to make sure your party goes off with a bang!
While methane is a greenhouse gas, as the article mentions, the amount used for balloons under any realistic scenario is going to be dwarfed by the megatons of methane that enter the atmosphere from natural processes (and, of course, natural gas is mostly methane). It's also dirt-cheap.
I think it's probably easier to avoid dangerous leaks than with hydrogen, though. Hydrogen molecules are small and sneaky.
(I do agree we should conserve it rather than use it for frivolous purposes.)
> I would say that no one on Earth could comprehend 1.4 trillion balloons
Consider this: If everyone on the planet got 1 party balloon every month, we'd deplete that helium source in about 10 years.
Quite a party.
There's a uniquely British phenomenon where large areas are given in terms of Wales. I think it's probably down to our national inability to decide if we're metric or imperial.
More info: https://www.theregister.com/2007/08/24/vulture_central_stand...
In completely metric Germany, we often use "Saarlands", which is also, like Wales, the smallest country / state.
1 Wales = 8 Saarlands
There's a right way and a wrong way to deal with quantities. This is a right way:
https://www.theregister.com/Design/page/reg-standards-conver...
That's not really a random unit of measurement. It's the only use of helium the audience can be expected to be familiar with.
Also, I can't imagine the seller would be like "hmm, this guy wants to buy gas rights on 87,000 hectares of land for $1. Sounds like a good deal!" without thinking maybe there was something special and investigated for themselves first.
I suspect it is tax evasion or a nepotism deal.
[1] https://www.property24.com/for-sale/bloemfontein-rural/bloem...
Other way around.
They bought gas rights - specifically they were interested in natural gas, but evidently the rights extend to any gas (I suppose there's an 'at room temperature' caveat in there, or this kind of right may set up some unexpected and highly unpleasant incentives).
It sounds like this was a highly speculative purchase, on land not considered hugely viable for extracting natural gas. There is, after all, the non-trivial problems & expenses around actually extracting, processing, shipping, and selling the gas(es).
Most refined helium is a byproduct of natural gas production. If we don't use the helium then natural gas drillers will just vent it into the atmosphere.
When you use helium, it literally floats to the top of the atmosphere and escapes into space. It's never, ever coming back. It's a totally different class of "nonrenewable".
On the other hand, I understand that it is a significant cost driver for industry.
With this news I guess it's not as precious as it was last month...
In the 90s, Congress ordered that the strategic helium reserve sell off most of its helium. That tanked the price, which meant it was affordable for party balloons. It also hurt the business of natural gas producers also producing helium.
But helium can also leak irrecoverably out the atmosphere. We should try to hold on to some of it.
Won't all atmospheric helium be lost to space? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_escape#/media/File... Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are the only planets that can retain helium, AFAIU.
It's so cheap that it's commonly used as a welding cover gas as a way to reduce electricity cost and to squeeze more work out of cheaper, lower power equipment. Recycling in the form of capture of storage boil-off, or even collection/retention of helium that can be safely vented from legacy equipment costs substantially more than just throwing it away forever.
But it's useful in ways that nothing else is. MRI is the biggest example, and the largest consumer of helium. There's a whole niche of magnetics that needs helium until science comes up with better magnetics, if that's possible.
Something that doesn't get a lot of detailed attention is leak detection, because there's nothing else that leaks nearly as well (hydrogen molecules are larger than helium atoms!), not to mention safely, as helium. A leaking vacuum jacket means substantial loss of insulation and increased boil-off. Leaking storage of gases is always dangerous - either it's flammable, or poisonous, or an asphyxiant because it's not oxygen, or it is oxygen and everything else is on fire. The process of using helium used for leak detection involves introducing helium into a vessel and looking for helium on the other side. The leak detector itself is a portable mass spectrometer. Leak detection and repair is an extremely rare skill set at any meaningful level of quality, depends on extremely specialized equipment, and it's as expensive as it sounds. If there was a better option, this leak detection niche for helium would be an academic novelty.
Anyway, if this helium source is what it claims to be, it's significant - about 60 years of current production.
https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/helium-statistics-and-info...
How can someone sell the gas rights for just $1? Whatever they find must be worth more, no? Is there a tax involved when someone extracts resources?
That can change if it turns out the actual resources are more valuable, easier to extract, or the liabilities can be resolved with significant investment. Sometimes people throw millions at things too, and don’t really break even. We can’t really see their books here, so we don’t know.
I don't know anything about South African law, but in my home (Alaska) these rights are typically put up for public auction, and yes, there is a further "severance tax" levied on any production that may eventually occur. The (relatively low) auction price is just to lock in exclusivity, generally for a limited length of time. One reason that the initial leases are low is that the actual amount of gas or oil on the property is generally unknown until you get out there and start drilling holes, or at least doing some seismic mapping.
If you find oil or gas and wind up producing it, you then have to pay taxes on that, but if there's nothing there, you haven't wasted your money.
Not all states have a severance tax, though.
It isn't pretty.
In order to do this, they bought up all the land from the locals. To power it all, they built dams along various rivers including the Mekong. Part of it was promises of providing electricity to communities, but it is really just a money grab.
It is all an utter eco disaster. Nobody cares cause it is all "developing nations". Tunnels straight through mountains (or just level them entirely). Zero concern destroyed forests. Buying up all the land from the locals so they could move their own families in and then charge the locals rent.
Property prices got pushed up such that locals can't even afford land in their own country. The dams have screwed up natural water flows so now there are drought and floods. Nam Ngum Reservoir in Laos shows up on Google maps full of blue water, but if you go there, it is empty.
There is interesting economics around USD in Cambodia too... becomes a great place for China to launder USD. They have their own currency, which is conveniently 1:0.25. The rare time you spend local currency, you get change in quarters.
None of this gets much news coverage, but google a bit and you'll find it all. Stuff like this...
https://www.intrepidtravel.com/adventures/why-we-no-longer-t...
A building collapsed (due to poor construction)...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48729072
and a few months later...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cambodia-gambling/thousan...
and now it is just a ghost town, which I'm sure is left half finished and a complete mess...
https://www.voacambodia.com/a/a-pandemic-and-gambling-ban-ha...
I went out to Koh Rong Island. It was supposed to be this beautiful place and it was a total dump with garbage everywhere. Sadly it seems I missed it by about 5 years.
None of this bodes well.
And you're right, history repeats itself. This definitely isn't just China.
Why did you do that?
I thought this was maybe due to massive royalties that must have been part of the deal.
Just because it's in Africa? I mean, wow, that's a stretch.