ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is AstraZeneca
BNT162b2 is Pfizer/BioNTech
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is AstraZeneca
BNT162b2 is Pfizer/BioNTech
This is a speed-up that pre-dates the mRNA trick Moderna had been working on, a virus from chimps (so humans aren't immune to it because it wouldn't infect humans normally, yet chimps are similar enough that the virus can get into a human cell) but hollowed out to make whatever you want instead of more copies of itself. You put any payload inside it and it'll re-program the patient's cells to make that for a brief period until the immune system cleans up the mess. This vaccine uses the spike protein as payload to train your immune system.
I suppose you mean the vaccine names are mainly useful for regulatory purposes, because the general population will continue to name the vaccines after the manufacturer or researchers?
In more normal times, most people outside of R&D would never encounter the name.
But I still maintain the official names are ridiculous. “Vaxzevria” is the trademark used by AstraZeneca in the EU. (As you say, not ChAdOx1.) And yes, the general population end up seeing Vaxzevria, on their vaccine information forms, and online at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/vaxzevria-...
For other drugs, an amazing amount of effort is devoted to finding something that a) sounds "promising" but b) without making legally-untenable promises.
The name `Viagra`, famously, is supposed to evoke ideas of vigor and Niagra (Falls). Pfizer had some trouble with Champix (varenicline), which some regulators thought was too close to "champion", and so was called Chantix in some markets instead.
Why couldn't they just be called Moderna/Pfizer/... Covid Vaccine?
[1] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/publi...
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210305190828/https://www.ema.e...