Why I didn’t apologize for that Yale Law School email
persuasion.community
persuasion.community
+
> an email was sent to Yale Law’s entire second-year class “condemn[ing] in the strongest possible terms” the “pejorative and racist language” in the invitation.
==
Yale Law administration was happy to lie to their entire second-year class.
If true, then the administration was more interested about protecting their brand, than caring about the health and wellbeing of any of their students
In a way this seems like the perfect use for an "I'm sorry you were offended" "apology".
Whether one, having learned that history, changes one's choice of language or shrugs, says "I didn't invent the term so its use is not my problem," and charges forward will influence the kind of company one keeps in our society.
This is still using loose language to try and equate two things that are not equal, "saying racist things" is still not the same thing as "being racist". Though it's getting closer, intent and context definitely matters.
ex. I use the term "black" to describe to people when applicable. There was a blip of time when that was a racist thing to say, some people probably still think it would be better to say "african-american" and might think the language is racist. But my use of the term is not because I am being racist.
The issue here is that there are those who would abuse good faith and nuance, but I generally think it's pretty obvious when it happens, and this seems to not be one of those times. It can be fatiguing to continually need to use critical thinking, but it's not something we can just stop doing if we want to keep progressing.
I think whether that assertion is true hinges on whether one is of the opinion that there is meaningful difference between one's actions and the content of one's character or whether "ye shall know them by their fruits," as it were.
But even if we use the duality approach of separating action from character: if one does a racist thing unintentionally, then given the opportunity to do so, does not apologize, I would be understanding of those who choose to believe that the action was a reflection of the content of the actor's heart.
Apologies are something we do when we've done wrong, after all. Whether the wrong was intended.
I thought his dissection of the word “corny” as a possible slur to his Native American background was a perfect illustration of how ridiculous his situation truly was.