Sand won’t save you this time (2008)
science.org
science.org
It's bounced around a couple hosts over the years, and sadly this latest incarnation on science.org doesn't preserve the tags from the original.
Nevertheless, look up "Derek Lowe things I won't work with" for a great and hilarious series of posts on "fun" chemicals.
For example:
* Peroxide Peroxides:
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
* Dioxygen Difluoride, or FOOF to its frenemies (let's put the two strongest oxidants together just for fun):
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
* Triazadienyl Fluoride:
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-wor...
I'm not sure why the "Things I Won't Work With" category/tag isn't working on the new platform; all other categories I checked seem to work, though I can't find a list of all categories.
People have gone to jail for this.
EDIT: To be clear, I am commenting as a way of venting over the ridiculous state of affairs, not because I agree or think that science.org will send the feds after you.
>Hah! Glad to see my “Things I Won’t Work With” series wrapped up with a nice conspiratorial bow on top. (I have to say, though, I never would have brought FOOF and dimethyl mercury together; you have a weird mind, which is a compliment you’ve probably heard before).
Sand won't save you this time (2008) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20432201 - July 2019 (30 comments)
Sand Won't Save You This Time - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5656994 - May 2013 (1 comment)
Sand Won't Save You This Time: the story of chlorine trifluoride - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=532278 - March 2009 (4 comments)
“it was magnificently hypergolic with many fuels. (I used to take advantage of this property when somebody came into my lab looking for a job. At an inconspicuous signal, one of my henchmen would drop the finger of an old rubber glove into a flask containing about 100 cc of mixed acid —and then stand back. The rubber would swell and squirm" a moment, and then a magnificent rocket-like jet of flame would rise from the flask, with appropriate hissing noises. I could usually tell from the candidate's demeanor whether he had the sort of nervous system desirable in a propellant chemist.)”
<<Ingestion: Ingestion is not considered a potential route of exposure. >> Read: nobody is dumb enough to eat this stuff
<<Hazardous Combustion Products: None that are more toxic than the product itself.>>
<<firefighting: Isolate the source of the fire or let it burn out.>>
[1] https://www.boconline.co.uk/en/images/chlorine-trifluoride_t...
I think we can agree, at least, that the intersection of "people smart enough to devise a way to ingest this without premature combustion of the head" and "people dumb enough to do it" is probably n<1
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
http://libgen.rs/search.php?req=John+Clark+Ignition&lg_topic...
Co-authored by Isaac Asimov!?
https://www.rutgersuniversitypress.org/ignition/978081359583...
https://www.quora.com/Is-chlorine-trifluoride-ionic
[shrug]