It's gotten so bad that the military was called in to restore peace.
The doctors there were on a news segment, completely burnt out and in tears, saying that 0% of their COVID patients are vaccinated and they're overrun.
So I believe this metric.
It's gotten so bad that the military was called in to restore peace.
The doctors there were on a news segment, completely burnt out and in tears, saying that 0% of their COVID patients are vaccinated and they're overrun.
So I believe this metric.
Sorry for being sceptical, but I've seen similar claims propagated on twitter "hospital so full, that gunshot victims are turned away". It was untrue both on accounts of being full and there being any gunshot victims.
I mean, you don't want anyone left behind. But if you're forced to leave someone behind, the question becomes "who?". If you have one emergency bed and in comes a drunk driver from an accident, shortly followed by the pregnant woman he ran over, I'm not a big fan of "first come, first served".
If and when doctors are forced into heinous choices, I'd think such considerations should play a role - for society allocating scarce resources, at the very least.
I may personally agree with the exact situation you describe, but relying on "common sense" breaks fast at scale. If the doctor(s) making the call are devout adherents of some religious sect, would you prefer that they prioritize the drunken driver above the pregnant woman who needs an abortion of the child that was conceived out of bedlock?
Or denying care to the heroin addict ODing?
IMO, completely removing moral judgment from the medical evaluation process is a net positive.
This doesn't have to mean "first come, first serve", and I assume it doesn't in most places.
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-china-managed-build-enti...
Similarly, I had a fever + 4 days of 20 hours of sleep after receiving the second Pfizer-Biontech dose.