Hacker News Reader

I'm someone who doesn't understand monads, and the tutorial basically lost me at "Just what is a Functor, really? Functor is a typeclass. Here's the definition"

Where typeclass links to this other massive tutorial and then my eyes started to glaze over.

(Side note, this is probably the 50th or so Monad tutorial I've read and I still don't understand them. For context, I've been programming professionally for nearly 20 years now. My only conclusion at this point is either Monads aren't actually that important, or I actually do understand some useful subset of what Monads are and I just don't know it, and I just never had a need to use them "fully".)

Edited to add: I think my problem with Monad tutorials is that they all tend to explain the concepts using Haskell, and I can't read Haskell. It syntax is utterly impenetrable to me and I have no idea what any of the silly symbols mean. And any tutorial that tries to teach Monads using other languages ultimately feels like it's teaching me something I don't need to know... (how to do side effects in a pure functional language, when I don't code in pure functional languages and likely never will.)

View on HN

interface ArrayFunctor<A, B> { map: (f: ((a: A) -> B), arr: Array<A>) -> Array<B> } interface PromiseFunctor<A, B> { map: (f: ((a: A) -> B), arr: Promise<A>) -> Promise<B> } interface ObservableFunctor<A, B> { map: (f: ((a: A) -> B), arr: Observable<A>) -> Observable<B> }