It's enough to convince vulnerable people who are calling out the misdeeds of the powerful.
It might not be enough to sway the powerful who compulsively deploy (Gov/Corp/LEO) revenge on people who call them out.
It's enough to convince vulnerable people who are calling out the misdeeds of the powerful.
It might not be enough to sway the powerful who compulsively deploy (Gov/Corp/LEO) revenge on people who call them out.
Vulnerable people like the trans community that is often the victim in this type of anonymous social media abuse? Are they allowed to call out the powerful and disproportionately white straight cis men who control social media companies and allow this abuse to continue?
I just find it funny that you are using an argument that is identical to the one used by some of the people you are arguing against.
50% /s
I'm 100% against it tbh. There are people that would be dead without it(just in case anyone missed the sarcasm)
There are also people who are dead because of the abuse they took on social media. Once again, the same argument from both sides.