The title is unfortunate, but I found this from a comment Brendan Eich made in another thread.
The TL;DR is that it's explicit filtering and ranking that you can apply to your search results as subscription feeds.
Like, say, never show Pinterest.
The TL;DR is that it's explicit filtering and ranking that you can apply to your search results as subscription feeds.
Like, say, never show Pinterest.
Oh dear lord, I live in hope. Pinterest results have completely ruined image search.
Even though I usually remember to include this manual filtering for images in my searches, it's cumbersome and inconvenient to need to type it, and I definitely don't want to have an extension that handles it for me. And even worse, is the enormous and growing proliferation of sites that just scrape StackOverflow and spam the top 10 places of code-queries with their robot-written word-salad of stolen results.
I've even thought about writing a terminal script that includes all of these sites, and which I could use as an intermediary step for opening searches in my browser. But honestly - a simple exclusion list should be a part of the built-in search.
edit: btw the exclusion needs to be '-site:pinterest.*' to totally exclude this pestilential image-stealing 'service' from results
Would super-love the ability to ‘own’ my search criteria. Ideally, via defined profiles.
I think it could get real traction on HN if there were a blog post on Brave summarizing the paper in a few paragraphs with a title something closer to:
Goggles: User Generated Search Rankings and Filters that you can subscribe to.
This feels less "hide pinterest" and more "further political divisiveness. by letting people hide news sources that don't match their worldview."
Brave is starting to set off crypto-fascist caution lights for me.
At least one is explicit