Women's quest to be 'romantically desirable' conflicts with scientific pursuits
sciencedaily.com
sciencedaily.com
It didn't change much in adulthood either, at least for me. Yet if programming has any connection to my complete inability to attract a woman (it's clearly not the whole story) it still doesn't matter because it's such a great career and hobby for me that I love passionately. So why are there so few adult women like this too?
But regardless, I personally don't entirely agree with the article's conclusion that the difference is purely dependent external factors like culture. I think guys like to tinker with tools more often than girls, and this interest is influenced by genetics.
If there is no negative impact, you overturn the long-presumed jock-versus-nerd social paradigm. If there is a negative impact, you overturn the presumed masculinity and gender norms cited here as being associated with STEM and force a little more nuance into this argument.
Women in the US aren't allowed to smart or funny. They can be hot, but not smart or funny. This isn't true in other places. Eastern Europe for one afaict doesn't discriminate against female intelligence.
Former Eastern European here -- not sure I would single out Eastern Europe as being "better" in gender norms. How do you explain the Devushka phenomenon? http://www.carpetblog.typepad.com/carpetblogger/2006/07/devu...
Going into STEM fields may anticorrelate with pursuing romantic interests -- but it doesn't imply that it correlates with intelligence/strength. I have encountered many more women with strong personalities who think for themselves among art students than among math grad students, for example. As a matter of fact, as a male, I am attracted to the "strong woman" type -- but paradoxically I find more women of that type among those who have liberal arts degrees. I believe this has something to do with engineering degrees being perceived as ones that "train you to be a corporate slave" rather than ones that strengthen your personality.