I can appreciate the effort and the sentiment of this post, but it definitely reveals a "shoot from the hip" mentality at the company.
ok. So how or who performs "the actions of a company" if not the "individuals inside the company"? Especially if these individuals are explicitly given access to official twitter account, etc... of the company.
And after all, said individual did performed actions while wearing his administrator hat. This deffinitely makes him part of the company.
Why do you think Google, Microsoft and all other big companies do not allow Engineers and programmers to make public statements (about the company), unless they specify with uppercase bolds that this is their own opinion.