HN is a technical embarrassment.
Regarding inefficiency, I doubt it takes more electricity than running an average sized social media, content, messaging, notification, whatever platforms. So in a consequentialist approach it works.
Is there a word for this? Defending obvious shortcomings as features because they are not fixable? It seems pretty endemic in hackerdom.
I am occasionally guilty
And regarding a name - "it's not a bug, it's a feature" - these people are collectively known as "programmers".
Did you buy this handle?
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=codingclaws
I subscribe to my own via RSS. Replies pop up like magic.
> Threads are closed to new comments after two weeks.
Usually HN recycles a few debates for this reason and it pops up a few times over the course of months until everyone finally hashes it out. The breather is good, go to sleep, sleep on it, come back in a few weeks, and we’ll go at it again.
If I got constant alerts about comments, it’s going to devolve into an endless back and forth where no one took a break. Similarly, it also allows people to throw out their perspective against different people versus myopically trying to reconcile differences with just one person.
I’ve been downvoted to hell on a topic one day, and then several weeks later got modest amount of upvotes for the same opinion.