There is a IMO a very tangible market demand for a financial product that allows one to completely shield value from the myriad of value-eroding propositions that have been baked into the traditional financial system to essentially bleed you dry on a long enough timeline.
- "management" fees
- capital gain taxes
- death taxes (inheritance taxes)
- asset seizures (divorces, bankruptcy, random court decisions against you, Cyprus Bank Disaster [1], etc...)
- inflation (govt mandated or otherwise)
- etc ...
No such product exists today in traditional finance, and imo quite a bit of the demand for Bitcoin comes from there.For example, many of the traditional way to shield your wealth (stock market, commodities, real-estate) fail to be prone to some of the events I list above.
You may not agree that Bitcoin solves all of the above, in which case please list something that gets as close.
The fact that some of the things listed above will be viewed by some as "morally reprehensible" is irrelevant to the conversation: moral or not, the demand still exists.
And for folks who look at Bitcoin for this (shielding wealth) the fact that Bitcoin has gone parabolic in the last 10 years is kind of a nice cherry on the cake.
Yes, if you decide to use BTC to shield value, you are taking a rather big risk (volatility, BTC could be hurt by govt cracking down on it, there will be a huge "event" when Tether finally implodes, etc ...).
But again, please list something that comes any closer to solving the problem.
The above is why I believe people who claim Bitcoin has no "intrinsic value" (a term I consider to be entirely meaningless) are wrong, even using their own definition of "intrinsic value".
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012%E2%80%932013_Cypriot_fina...