And you can't dislike the recommendation, so next week the algorithm is going to go "Oohh last week he played some mumble rap, let's give him a little bit more of it!"
I remember this being easier to find. I guess Spotify might have changed it.
I too have "eclectic, obscure" tastes and I couldn't get anything from the recommendation algorithm and canceled after a month. I don't remember the thing recommending anything that seemed more obscure than what I searched for. And I made playlists.
But seriously, some people's tastes are served by Spotify and some find it frustrating. It would be nice if those who don't get immediate satisfaction had a more sophisticated approach available. My hunch is the company would prefer less customers and more control.
They might want a bit more control, I don't know, but I very highly doubt fewer customers is the goal. If they wanted fewer, they could just pull the free model completely. I'd guess piracy would increase and they'd get blamed, but I don't know.
So each day when my mood changes, I'm suppose start searching for a bunch of tunes and after an hour, I get what I want?
If 70% of folks like popular music, that's the easiest thing to recommend.
"Brilliant AI" ... turns into just top40 radio and victory is proclaimed.
They might want a bit more control, I don't know, but I very highly doubt fewer customers is the goal
This is what I said with a slightly different spin - they're willing to trade control for customers. Whenever companies engage in annoying or abusive policies that drive away customers, it's not that they don't want customers in the abstract, it's that they prefer control and profit margins over customers.
- Early skipping a song from a generated play list (-1). - Repeat playing the same song from a generated play list (+1)
Good recommendations obviously require good data. You sort of get what you put in to an extent.