Great to hear that! No plans at the moment to support larger than RAM indices - that’s the trade-off we had to make for performance.
Mind if I ask how large of an index size you’re looking at?
Mind if I ask how large of an index size you’re looking at?
There are, of course, many use cases where one does not need that speed. Eventually, like Redis we will probably have an option to use SSD storage smartly for these non-latency sensitive use cases. That's not our immediate focus though.
Application level sharding/merging for more consistent index size is on the list of things to do, but given the complexity of that it’s a “not before we really need to” kind of task haha.