Also, they show the app drawer screen instead of the default home screen.
Samsung wasn't allowed to see any of this evidence before the court gave the injunction.
Is it even possible that this wasn't deliberate, willful deception on the part of Apple lawyers?
The evidence provided can be taken at face value by the courts but if they are asked to do that, lying or misleading is punished harshly.
Did they? A quick browse through Google image search shows lots of Tab 10.1 pictures, many with a Samsung logo and many without (here for example: http://popherald.com/samsung-galaxy-tab-honeycomb-release-da...).
Most of the pics without a logo seem to be pre-release marketing photos. I wonder if the Apple submittal grabbed a marketing photo someplace. We shall soon see.
http://techcitement.com/admin/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Box...
Edit:
It also does not appear on their website: http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy-tab/GT-P7510MAYXAB
Unrelated but sort of funny in that context, they seem to photoshop iOS screenshots onto Galaxy devices (scroll down where they show the maps feature)
In fact, the charge is that one image is so modified. The original document[1] contains many images, in which you can clearly see the difference that is supposedly being covered up. While I can totally see Apple being reprimanded for this, I think it's extremely doubtful that it's going to change the court's opinion overall.
The other images are much more difficult to compare. If you were to pick one image to alter in that document to 'make your case', they picked the most influential one. It is difficult for me to see that as accidental.
[1]:Even though the photo makes the aspect ratio look similar, they aren't actually claiming that in the text as one of the features of the design that were lifted. They closest they come is citing the exact dimensions (which they list) as "very similar".
Usually the courts don't take kindly to being lied to, especially leading to a emergency decision prohibiting the sale of devices. Lets see what happens.