The whole movement of correcting social wrongs is made by barking at a social hegemons. And now we come full circle as people seem to believe there are general rules again, except they are the opposite of the rules that started to be barked at.
With a caveat: it's not possible to agree that we have come full circle. The previous hegemon canonized the ones in the "down" direction. And so we get to you, babbling about everyone agrees that it's better not to attack the "down" people.
Sure.
Not by virtue of its blackness, indigenous or sex status, but only in relation to other people. If other people were to praise blackness, indigenousness and being non-man, it would not suffer, but thrive.
Do not essentialize.
My mistake was to engage.
It's almost impossible to punch down on Trump supporters because they overwhelmingly represent a movement by which the privileged classes are attempting to maintain their privilege and power, and because they're constantly punching down with their mockery and disdain for marginalized classes and their issues.
Of course, not all of these apply to all Trump supporters (his gain among Latino and Black voters in the last election being a counterexample) but I seriously doubt none apply to any.
A lot of the late night comedians keep their jokes focused on the politician and his TV cronies. Any jokes targeting supporters have always been about a specific person because of something they've done or said, rather strictly based on their politics. Ex: Colbert's Seditionists Roundup. Or will say, "supports are of the former president claim..." then offer a direct quote, usually using a clip of the person in question making whatever statement is the butt of the joke.
It’s also important to distinguish between mocking of Trump versus Trump supporters, as these are often conflated.