Trumpist county clerk barred after leak of voting-system passwords to QAnon
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
> The court ruling "does not affect Peters' authority over other aspects of the clerk's office, including motor vehicle registrations and business filings," Colorado Public Radio wrote.
In court she didn't dispute the facts of the case, but nevertheless claims "she was just doing her job."
I'm surprised she's still allowed to stay in office with no other repercussions.
Her job sounds like a lot of paperwork, I certainly don't intend to replace her.
Isn't enabling examination of the software on the voting machines a good idea? All the more so as the number of people crying about how its a problem that "the software isnt seekrit anymore" adds up.
It differs from using "View Source" in that the HTML source of websites is publicly available, viewable and not confidential, whereas the material leaked by the county clerk was not publicly available, not intended for public view, and was confidential.
In other words, it differs from using "View Source" in the way that all forms of actual espionage do.
>Isn't enabling examination of the software on the voting machines a good idea?
Even assuming this was a reasonable interpretation of QAnon's motives and intent (it is not,) a violent political cult that believes the Democratic party is secretly a cabal of satanic pedophiles who conspired with Chinese communists to steal the Presidential election is not the group to be trusted with such a responsibility.