A half-mile installation just took 20k pounds of plastic out of the Pacific
businessinsider.com
businessinsider.com
Whilst it might take 10 Jenny's (20 ships) 5 years to clean up 50% of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, that's significantly less plastic in the sea than if they sat on the sidelines because what they've got isn't perfect. 20 small ships traveling incredibly slowly is nothing compared to the tankers and freighters delivering all the cheap plastic crap in the first place.
Similarly, mentioning that their efforts are negligible compared to the plastics still being dumped into the sea whilst also pointing out that removing it from the sea is more costly than preventing it in the first instance actually undermines the snarky "why bother" tone they've taken.
Yes, preventing plastic from entering the sea, and reducing the amount of plastic created in the first place is something we should (and are?) trying to accomplish world-wide as that's where the biggest payoff lies, but it still leaves plastic in the sea that needs removing: something these guys have taken a good crack at solving and done better than anyone else as far as I know.
Whole article reeks of a defeatist — "it's hopeless, why bother?" — attitude. I'm pleased to see progress, however small.
[1] https://theoceancleanup.com/rivers/ [2] https://theoceancleanup.com/updates/why-we-must-clean-the-oc...
Most countries seem pretty open to this solution as another measure to reduce garbage, as they don’t have a reliable way of enforcing garbage prevention.
Also, I don’t like the defeatist snark of the article either.
It's a great effort, but for now it seems like it's just trading pollution for pollution...
Personally, I think the plastics in the ocean are probably more harmful than the emissions required to clean it up, but it's not as simple as saying "look, we cleaned it up and now there's x-amount less pollution".
I probably shouldn't make such brief, inarticulate comments.
Capturing new trash requires a different approach.
aka 7 tons? and no timeframe was specified, and the ships in the picture look like they will happily burn 10 tons of fuel per day.
Given the target speed of 1.5knots, I wonder if a large enough solar installation on a pair of modified tugs could achieve a decent runtime. Or perhaps focus on using the solar to generate hydrogen for a hydrogen burning engine given the availability of water.