How does assigning greater importance to learning lead to mixing up identities?
There doesn't seem to be a link to the actual paper (if there is one yet) - the DISCERN link is to a 1998 paper. The idea of a "story parser" is interesting...
There doesn't seem to be a link to the actual paper (if there is one yet) - the DISCERN link is to a 1998 paper. The idea of a "story parser" is interesting...
I believe this is the paper, from the abstract it seems like hyperlearning is related to greater consolidation of memory, which might imply creation of connections between things that are not really connected
It's not uncommon for me to have thoughts that very much makes sense and is meaningful to me while others simply can't make any sense of it what-so-ever.
This means I'll have to be cautious of my own thoughts and I often doubt them.
Thoughts as well as meanings change over time too. Sometimes I write down ideas I think is brilliant to save for later. Revisiting those writings can be troubling because I might not be able to make a similar sense of what I wrote earlier.
I have doubts about Science based on making up computer models and seeing what happens (although it is a lot of fun to do). OTOH, they clearly casting this as merely a hypotheses - which is pretty reasonable.
According to popular mechanics, the article was published in the online version of Biological Psychiatry. This seems to be the issue in question: http://bit.ly/n66BeO
DISCERN was just as eager to adopt the life of a crime boss named Vito
or to thrust its assigned identity onto another character.Reading that at first I thought the writer had completely mixed up schizophrenia and multiple personality disorders. Something that is not uncommon at all in the media and pop culture.