Lies of B-School
forbes.com
forbes.com
1. If you want to become a Goldman (or similar caliber) I-banker or work at a top flight consulting firm, a top MBA is the way to go.
Yes there are other ways to get these jobs, but the recruiting processes for these firms are highly targeted and organized when it comes to hiring people from prestigious MBA programs. It truly is the path of least resistance. And if you truly set your mind to becoming employed by one of these firms, you can likely attain it once admitted to a top business school. We can argue the merits of joining one of these companies, but that's another argument entirely.
2. If you go work at said type of firm, your employment options thereafter are wide open.
I don't have statistics to back this up, but having worked in corporate for a healthy portion of my career, Goldman and McKinsey candidates were often ear-marked for positions that they applied for.
3. The MBA is good for "career changers".
Assuming you want to go the corporate route, an MBA is a very versatile degree. If from a top school, it practically forgives whatever you were doing before the MBA and enables you to transition into something largely unrelated if that's your wish. You need to do a whole lot of networking and build your story to make this happen, but with two years to do so, there's plenty of time. And the fact of the matter is that, regardless of how you regard MBAS, plenty of highly regarded corporates (including Google!) formally plug into the recruiting process at top schools.
EDIT: I understand many of the arguments above may not apply to the HN community as it skews entrepreneurial and perhaps academic, but I believe they have merit nonetheless.
The problem with MBAs IMO is that they teach you "play the game" more than they teach you to be better at doing business.
MBA projects are more often than not group work and in your group you'll have a marketing person, a financial expert, an electrical engineer, and maybe a teacher who wants to change careers. It's like herding cats sometimes to get people on the same page, not because they're dumber or slower than you, the Python wiz, but because they're used to solving problems differently.
For me, this was the best part of my MBA. I really improved my sensitivity to others' understanding of issues and became more "personable".
However, I feel that I obtained a similar education in teamwork by working odd jobs throughout my law and computer science studies.
The buzzword soup that MBAs pick up is definitely one of the weaker elements of the program on the whole. I've had professors admit that they want their students to learn these terms ("paradigm shift" is my favourite) so that they can "sound smart at cocktail parties"
Is this really the kind of reasoning they teach in business school?
Anyone working on big projects with a client can testify to this.
I do wonder if the B-school route is just the cop-out for me because it plays to my existing strengths, and let's me boost the resume without being on the corporate treadmill for a few years.
Would love to hear from others who've got MBAs on here. The coding community is generally negative about MBAs, but does anyone on here have any advise?
Are technology-management-focused MBA programs ever any different?
Sounds like you may be a glue guy. Good writeups on glue guys in sports:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/story/_/id/5308513/ce...
http://www.google.com/search?q=glue+guy+grant+hill (can't find the actual article, but there was a good one on Grant Hill and how he changes game stats)
Biggest problem may be that that role seems more needed in a sports team or the military than a tech business.
11. You know how to proofread.
Deleted comment