Long dead Hitler and Goebbels are included too, but why stop there? Where's Joseph Stalin and Vlad the Impaler.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21083819/pages/facebo...
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21083819/pages/facebo...
After the Romans captured Carthage they murdered 450,000 of its inhabitants.
This makes Caesar's Place in Las Vegas very culturally problematic.
And the Spanish Inquisition, Bluebeard, Ivan The Terrible, Robespierre, Lenin, Beelzebub and Donald J. Trump?
The ban list is way too short.
Apocalypto focussed on the Maya, who aren't even from the same continent as the Inca.
Are you trying to be sarcastic? Satire is dead because no one can tell any more. The internet is so vast that at least a few people have your absurd opinion, possibly including you.
There probably aren't that many Vlad the Impaler apologists in the world, given that he's a functionally irrelevant person to be an apologist for. That's perhaps less the case for Stalin, but even Marxist-Leninists (seem) to make fewer excuses for Stalin-the-human than neo-Nazis do for Hitler-the-human.
Literally the entire genre of Vampire literature disagrees.
I wasn't under the impression that there was any particular political message behind contemporary vampire fiction. Dracula itself is full of political messages, but probably not the ones you're thinking of[1].