Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by ethbr0 | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

ethbr0·

USD2021$15M per Falcon 9 launch (re-used, assuming first launch was paid for by a customer) [0]

60 Starlink satellites per Falcon 9 launch [1]

= + USD2021$250,000 in launch costs per satellite (+ manufacturing / ops costs)

[0] https://www.elonx.net/how-much-does-it-cost-to-launch-a-reus...

[1] https://space4peace.org/starlink-gears-up-to-launch-nearly-1...

View on HN

As a reference a new Cessna 172 is $432,000 [1] and that is not a high tech aircraft.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/erictegler/2021/04/28/prices-fo...

This feels like comparing potatoes and pineapples.

A new Cessna vs a used Falcon 9 launch hardly seems like a fair comparison. The cost of the rocket is written off as externalized. The actual satellites are not factored in at all. Really what we are comparing here is the cost of an operation vs the cost of an airplane. The economics still seem dubious.

And a Cessna 172 has to be human safe.

Indeed, and the $432,000 is the price on the consumer market. A mass order of Zephyrs by, say, the British Government is sure to land a much smaller price tag per unit then a lone hobby pilot can expect when buying a single airplane.

On top of this, if Starship is successful ("fully and rapidly reusable") it could bring the launch cost down another order of magnitude.

And because Starlink is building thousands of satellites it has economies of scale that no previous satellite/spacecraft had.

If Airbus is successful, you'd have to compare SpaceX's scale to a similarly massive manufacturing operation of solar-powered aircraft. And you could theoretically make money from multiple sources since the aircraft could carry multiple pieces of equipment. You could make money from being an ISP and from selling imaging services.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com