England's Data Guardian warns of plans to grant police access to patient data
theregister.com
theregister.com
The people behind making these plays for data don't care about "trust and confidence," in instutions because from their perspective, when they have data, the power, and are specially protected by the law, they don't need your trust or confidence. Police with access to medical records means a source of blackmail to leverage against potential witnesses, political dissidents, and basically, anyone they please. I can see the argument now, "You mean you will give access to these random university researchers to explore it, but you won't give it to us to solve this very henious crime? Tsk.."
It's so egregious for anyone who understands what it is, but there is so little popular resistance I can only assume nobody else cares.
This is excellent from a healthcare perspective. It means that if someone needs care they don't have to think twice about it. They can just seek that care. This looks like it might destroy that trust, and IMO that's not at all worth it.
But I am really curious about which bullshit justification they came up with for that. It must be really creative.
I don't imagine it was hard, the police in the UK spend an awful lot of time dealing with people with some kind of mental illness.
Yes, its unfortunate they have to spend so much time dealing with their colleagues and lawmakers.
They said that some of the answers were so easy they could have guessed them with zero experience or experience. But there were many who failed them with an overall mark just high enough to pass.
When you go giving a group of people power, it's sobering to think about who those individual people might be - especially in an organisation that is so widespread, requires little education and has been accused of lowering hiring standards due to staff shortages.
Prosecutors are going to chose the one that is most easily convicted. And that may or may not be the person who's actually guilty. It will most likely be the one who cracks the most easily under interrogation (read: trusts that the police are "helping them clear things up"). The actually guilty person would think to STFU and get a lawyer; an innocent person is going to think this "honest mistake" will get cleared up.
But history has been populated by way more dystopia and bloody revolutions and governments that crush the people, than collective harmony Utopias.
Human beings are way more primitive than we realize I think and will corrupt ANY system, capitalism, socialism, democracy, etc.
I don't know if it's because power corrupts or sociopaths get into power. So while it seems good at first over time that power will be abused.
Even the CHURCH was selling indulgences at one point.
I don't actually believe that any more. I think maybe they actually relish is the idea that others would be forced to conform to their beliefs about how everyone must think and behave and be ruled.
They might believe it would be a utopia, but it would be specifically a utopia of their specification, and specifically excluding any possibility of different utopias, different opinions, non-conformance. Maybe not, maybe they do believe they are doing good. But the dream is always a fundamentally narcissistic, selfish, and naive utopia even if they are incapable of seeing anything but generosity and greatness in their own plans and therefore genuinely believe they are doing good.
Good job.